01.12.2014 Views

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Requirements<br />

Comments<br />

into an allocation <strong>for</strong>mula to avoid disputes<br />

on what constitutes appropriate testing of<br />

wells. You may propose an allocation<br />

<strong>for</strong>mula other than the commonly used one;<br />

however, you should offer detailed<br />

justification as to why the ERCB should<br />

deviate from its consistent practice in<br />

determining an allocation <strong>for</strong>mula.<br />

In some cases it may be useful to set<br />

minimum rates, with a percentage allocation<br />

above the minimum rate. If a well falls below<br />

the minimum rate, other wells are restricted<br />

only to their minimum rates <strong>and</strong> not below.<br />

15) If you are requesting, pursuant to Section<br />

53(5)(b) of the OGCA, that the ERCB, in<br />

order to give effect to the common processor<br />

declaration, direct the total amount of gas to<br />

be processed by the common processor from<br />

the pool or pools subject to the common<br />

processor declaration,<br />

a) a statement of why you believe such a<br />

total volume should be set,<br />

b) a discussion <strong>and</strong> documentation<br />

indicating what negotiations were carried<br />

out in regard to the total amount of gas to<br />

be processed by the common processor<br />

from the pool or pools subject to the<br />

common processor declaration <strong>and</strong> where<br />

the impasse lies, <strong>and</strong><br />

c) a statement of the total amount of gas<br />

you propose be processed by the<br />

common processor from the pool or<br />

pools subject to the common processor,<br />

together with a discussion of how the<br />

volume was determined.<br />

16) If you are requesting, pursuant to Section 56<br />

of the OGCA, that the proposed order be<br />

effective prior to the date the order is issued<br />

but not prior to the date the application <strong>for</strong><br />

the order was made to the ERCB, a<br />

discussion as to why the order should be<br />

effective on the requested date, including<br />

ERCB <strong>Directive</strong> <strong>065</strong>: <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>Applications</strong> / Common Processor (October 2011) • 1-27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!