21.03.2015 Views

#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network

#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network

#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Status <strong>of</strong> <strong>Coral</strong> <strong><strong>Reef</strong>s</strong> <strong>of</strong> Australasia<br />

LEARNING FROM <strong>2002</strong> GREAT BARRIER REEF BLEACHING EVENT<br />

The vast extent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>2002</strong> high temperature anomaly on the Great Barrier <strong>Reef</strong><br />

(GBR) indicated by the NOAA 50km 2 hotspot maps prompted the Australian Institute<br />

<strong>of</strong> Marine Science (AIMS) to use their high resolution SST data to guide site selection<br />

in a large study <strong>of</strong> bleaching impact and survival. AIMS collated 3-day average satellite<br />

sea surface temperature (SST) maps at 1km 2 resolution for the period December 2001<br />

to March <strong>2002</strong>. This enabled the identification <strong>of</strong> reefs in a 500,000km 2 area that had<br />

been exposed to the greatest physical stress (i.e. highest temperature anomalies), for<br />

field verification. Moreover with the maps, it was possible to select reefs in relatively<br />

hotter and cooler reef waters (as controls), and select relatively hotter and cooler<br />

habitats within hotter and cooler reefs as the pixel scale was 1 km 2 . Fieldwork was<br />

conducted in June - July <strong>2002</strong> at 64 sites on 32 reefs from the central to the southern<br />

Great Barrier <strong>Reef</strong> (over 1000km, from 1km from the coast, to 200km out in the<br />

<strong>Coral</strong> Sea).<br />

In the coolest water patches, there were no reefs with damage from coral bleaching at<br />

any site or any depth. However, in the hottest water patches, there was significant<br />

coral mortality from bleaching with some unusual patterns. Some ubiquitous hard<br />

corals that were considered to be the most sensitive (e.g. family Pocilloporidae)<br />

survived well, where others (Acroporidae and Faviidae) had suffered significant levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> injury and mortality. Within ubiquitous genera, there was range <strong>of</strong> sensitivities (e.g.<br />

Acropora and Porites) with some showing little mortality. Many coral species that<br />

normally have low stored energy reserves (e.g. Acropora, Montipora) were still alive or<br />

white in mid-winter (when temperatures were 20°C plus or minus a few degrees)<br />

suggesting they were obtaining their nutrition from capturing food from the water<br />

(heterotrophic nutrition). These results indicate that there are more heat tolerant<br />

corals that may increase in abundance to replace losses <strong>of</strong> the more sensitive species<br />

in coming decades. There was also local variability in bleaching and mortality within<br />

reefs that may be related to the local shape <strong>of</strong> the reef and variations in currents.<br />

Selected species are being examined to determine if there are genetic markers in the<br />

symbiotic algae (zooxanthellae) that code for greater heat tolerance. The final goal is<br />

to identify reefs with more resistance to bleaching as these should be the focus for<br />

coral reef MPA planning around the world. The study was conducted with support<br />

from the Nature Conservancy and the David and Lucille Packard Foundation. From:<br />

Terry Done, Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Marine Science, <br />

by habitat loss, particularly the die-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> inshore seagrasses after flooding, drowning in set<br />

gillnets, boat strikes and indigenous hunting. Pressures on turtle populations in Australian<br />

waters include trawl and shark nets, traditional hunting, floating rubbish and boat-strikes,<br />

as well as habitat loss and destruction <strong>of</strong> nests by feral pigs and foxes. While there is strong<br />

protection for turtles in Australian waters, these animals <strong>of</strong>ten migrate thousands <strong>of</strong><br />

kilometres to areas where they are hunted and nests are emptied.<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!