#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network
#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network
#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Status <strong>of</strong> <strong>Coral</strong> <strong><strong>Reef</strong>s</strong> <strong>of</strong> the World: <strong>2002</strong><br />
SPECIAL MPAS AND OTHER SITES<br />
A special focus <strong>of</strong> the GCRMN is to facilitate coral reef monitoring as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
performance evaluation in marine protected areas (MPAs) with reefs. Below are summary<br />
tables for three major ‘categories’ <strong>of</strong> protected areas. There is a poor representation <strong>of</strong><br />
coral reef areas in World Heritage Sites <strong>of</strong> UNESCO, and this was a special theme <strong>of</strong> a<br />
meeting <strong>of</strong> experts in Hanoi in February <strong>2002</strong>, to recommend priority sites for World<br />
Heritage recognition. The Man and the Biosphere sites were designated by UNESCO to<br />
promote research on natural environments, but there are few <strong>of</strong> these which have a large<br />
component <strong>of</strong> coral reefs. Finally, the ICRAN project has selected 17 sites around the<br />
world to serve as key demonstrations <strong>of</strong> best practice in coral reef conservation.<br />
The summary tables below contain subjective assessments <strong>of</strong> coral reef areas as a<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> the major natural resources listed as targets for conservation. More details<br />
on these sites are attached in the respective regional chapter. These illustrate that many <strong>of</strong><br />
these sites have been established to conserve other natural resources with coral reefs<br />
being incidental (estimated proportion <strong>of</strong> coral reefs as % <strong>of</strong> natural resources). The tables<br />
also contain a subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> ecological and socio-economic<br />
monitoring, with the implication that those sites with major components <strong>of</strong> coral reefs<br />
should have higher levels <strong>of</strong> monitoring. Obtaining information for some <strong>of</strong> the sites was<br />
not easy, thus the GCRMN would appreciate corrections to the assessments and the<br />
information. Our goal is to update these tables in future to show when more sites are<br />
declared for protection and measure any increases in monitoring.<br />
THE ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CORAL REEF INITIATIVE IN CONSERVING CORAL REEFS<br />
ICRI was a product <strong>of</strong> the rising concern over the status <strong>of</strong> coral reefs and dire predictions<br />
from 1992 and 1993, and the calls to action expressed at the Rio de Janeiro Environment<br />
Summit in 1992. ICRI aims to catalyse solutions to problems brought to the ‘table’,<br />
around which sit representatives <strong>of</strong> developing and developed governments, UN agencies,<br />
international NGOs, foundations and coral reef scientists. ICRI also acts through<br />
governments and international agencies to bring coral reef concerns to the attention <strong>of</strong><br />
international forums such as UN Conventions, UN General Assembly etc.<br />
The sharing <strong>of</strong> the Secretariat has succeeded in bringing new ideas and expertise to the<br />
table every 2 years, but it has been inefficient in that the learning experiences <strong>of</strong> each<br />
secretariat are dissipated after 2 years. The current arrangement <strong>of</strong> shared responsibility<br />
between the Philippines, a developing, and Sweden, a developed country was aimed at<br />
bringing the two perspectives together, with the Philippines providing a conduit for the<br />
views <strong>of</strong> the developing world, and Sweden channelling views <strong>of</strong> the European Union and<br />
other developed countries to members. However, the lack <strong>of</strong> dedicated funding for the<br />
ICRI Secretariat and the reliance on host country resources to support its operations, have<br />
meant that the views <strong>of</strong> the developing world have not received the emphasis necessary to<br />
arrest the problems faced by the coral reefs and their human populations. Thus there is a<br />
need for ICRI to establish a more stable network <strong>of</strong> coordinators, which will require<br />
sustainable funding. As in most situations, funding for coordination is more difficult to<br />
obtain than funds for on-the-ground activities (which will be more efficient if there is a<br />
system <strong>of</strong> coordination able to link similar activities elsewhere).<br />
14