21.03.2015 Views

#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network

#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network

#Status of Coral Reefs 2002 - International Coral Reef Action Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Status <strong>of</strong> <strong>Coral</strong> <strong><strong>Reef</strong>s</strong> <strong>of</strong> the World: <strong>2002</strong><br />

damage to some reefs are being addressed. Thus the major future threats to the Great<br />

Barrier <strong>Reef</strong> and other areas are considered to be from global climate change with rises in<br />

sea surface temperatures and concentrations <strong>of</strong> dissolved carbon dioxide.<br />

MONITORING AND GAPS IN REEF MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT<br />

There is a lack <strong>of</strong> trained scientists and technicians able to monitor coral reefs in PNG,<br />

and many that have been trained from government departments and academic<br />

institutions have either moved to other tasks or recruited by NGOs, mining companies or<br />

tourism operators. Thus, similar to most developing countries, there is a need to<br />

continually train people in baseline monitoring methods such as the <strong>Reef</strong> Check and<br />

methods recommended by the GCRMN. The University <strong>of</strong> Papua New Guinea (UPNG) has<br />

a program to train students in survey techniques in association with local dive operators.<br />

The best potential for a regular monitoring program is through dive tourism and their<br />

capacity to visit many reefs areas, with the PNG Divers Association already playing a<br />

significant role in monitoring and establishing marine conservation programs. The other<br />

major opportunity for monitoring is through the major NGOs working with communities<br />

to establish and manage marine protected areas.<br />

Probably the most extensive long-term coral reef monitoring in the world has been run by<br />

the Australian Institute <strong>of</strong> Marine Science’s Long-term Monitoring Program. It first<br />

started in the early 1980s with monitoring <strong>of</strong> the COTS on the GBR, and has continued in<br />

various incarnations to cover almost 20 years <strong>of</strong> continual assessment <strong>of</strong> benthic<br />

organisms and reef fishes. Individual scientists at AIMS also have long-term monitoring<br />

within research projects. There has also been a long-term water quality monitoring<br />

programme for the GBRMPA, including nutrient concentrations that flow into reef waters<br />

from coastal rivers. Monitoring also covers populations <strong>of</strong> seabirds, turtles, dugongs and<br />

fisheries catch statistics. A recent innovation is a combined Australia-USA project <strong>of</strong><br />

remote sensing (NOAA-NESDIS) combined with real-time recording from AIMS automatic<br />

weather stations to identify locations at risk <strong>of</strong> coral bleaching. This was particularly<br />

valuable in providing the locations for direct observation to assess the <strong>2002</strong> coral<br />

bleaching event on the GBR. The Government <strong>of</strong> Western Australia and AIMS also have<br />

monitoring programs at Ningaloo <strong>Reef</strong>, Scott <strong>Reef</strong> and the Rowley Shoals in Western<br />

Australia. There are however, large areas <strong>of</strong> reefs across northern Australia where there is<br />

no monitoring and little baseline information.<br />

LEGISLATION AND REGULATION<br />

While there are adequate laws and legislation to conserve and manage natural resources<br />

in PNG, most <strong>of</strong> these do not recognise traditional rights. Most are also not specific for<br />

coral reefs and are spread across different sectors (e.g. fisheries, mining, environmental<br />

protection), thereby leading to confusion over priority <strong>of</strong> laws and responsibility for<br />

management. The government has minimal capacity or will to enforce laws, quotas and<br />

regulations, with local communities <strong>of</strong>ten assuming the role <strong>of</strong> enforcing fisheries and<br />

MPA regulations. A national surveillance strategy has been suggested which would<br />

involve all sectors, but the most effective will continue to be through local communities<br />

by expanding community based management programs.<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!