12.04.2015 Views

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16o<br />

THE PROPHET ARMED<br />

Not for a moment did Trotsky imagine, however, that <strong>the</strong><br />

Russian Revolution could survive in isolation for decades. It<br />

may <strong>the</strong>refore be said, as Stalin was to say twenty years later,<br />

that he 'underrated' <strong>the</strong> internal resources and vitality of<br />

revolutionary Russia. The miscalculation, obvious in retrospect,<br />

is less surprising when one considers that <strong>the</strong> view<br />

expressed by Trotsky in 1906 was to become <strong>the</strong> common<br />

property of all Bolshevik leaders, including Stalin, in <strong>the</strong> years<br />

between 1917 and 1924. Hindsight, naturally, dwells on this<br />

particular error so much that <strong>the</strong> error overshadows <strong>the</strong> forecast<br />

as a whole. True enough, Trotsky did not foresee that Soviet<br />

Russia would survive in isolation for decades. But who, apart<br />

from him, foresaw, in 1906, <strong>the</strong> existence of Soviet Russia?<br />

Moreover, Trotsky himself, indirectly and unknowingly, provided<br />

in advance <strong>the</strong> clue to his own error-it is found in his<br />

appraisal of <strong>the</strong> Russian peasantry. I ts political helplessness and<br />

lack of independence best account for <strong>the</strong> survival of a collectivist<br />

regime in a country in which <strong>the</strong> individualistic peasantry<br />

formed <strong>the</strong> overwhelming majority, and also for <strong>the</strong> forcible<br />

and relatively successful imposition of collectivism upon it.<br />

In apparent contradiction of his own view, Trotsky <strong>the</strong>n<br />

stated that <strong>the</strong> proletarian regime would break down as soon<br />

as <strong>the</strong> muzhiks turned against it. This error, if an error it was,<br />

was intimately bound up with his conception of <strong>the</strong> revolution,<br />

as he stated it in 1905-6. It did not occur to him that a proletarian<br />

party would in <strong>the</strong> long run rule and govern an enormous<br />

country against <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> people. He did not<br />

foresee that <strong>the</strong> revolution would lead to <strong>the</strong> prolonged rule ofa<br />

minority. The possibility of such a rule was implicit in his<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory; but its actuality would still have appeared to him, as to<br />

nearly all his contemporaries, incompatible with socialism. In<br />

fact, he did not imagine, in spite of all he had written about<br />

Lenin's 'Jacobinism', that <strong>the</strong> revolution would seek to escape<br />

from its isolation and weakness into totalitarianism.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> trend of his thought is considered as a whole, <strong>the</strong>n it<br />

may be said that k1rdly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!