12.04.2015 Views

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTE ON TROTSKY'S MILITARY WRITINGS 481<br />

carried out by Stalin and Tukhachevsky, were those which Smilga<br />

had stated in 1920. The counter-reform also harmonized with <strong>the</strong><br />

general authoritarian trend of <strong>the</strong> time.<br />

The problem of military doctrine occupies an important place in<br />

Trotsky's writings. He himself claimed no originality in this field.<br />

But he brought to <strong>the</strong> discussion of <strong>the</strong> issues a broad view of history<br />

and a freshness of approach which, if <strong>the</strong>y were not enough to make<br />

a new philosophy of war, did much to guard <strong>the</strong> Red Army from<br />

pitfalls of one-sided doctrines. He had to contend against <strong>the</strong> old<br />

generals on <strong>the</strong> one hand, and against young revolutionary officef3<br />

on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. To <strong>the</strong> former he spoke as an innovator, attacking<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir conservative habits of thought. To <strong>the</strong> latter he appeared<br />

almost as an advocate of military orthodoxy.<br />

He was <strong>the</strong> presiding spirit of Jlvfoscow's Military Academy,<br />

where <strong>the</strong> old generals were professors and lecturers. He strove to<br />

modernize <strong>the</strong> Academy's curriculum, to free it from pedantry, and<br />

to bring it close to <strong>the</strong> fresh experiences of warfare. Once, for<br />

instance, he expostulated with <strong>the</strong> writers of <strong>the</strong> Academy for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

lifeless pseudo-historical style and urged <strong>the</strong>m to emulate French<br />

military writers who, he said, knew how to combine historical research<br />

with an interest in contemporary warfare and in its sociological<br />

background. The academicians viewed <strong>the</strong> civil war ra<strong>the</strong>r contemptuously,<br />

as a bastard of grand strategy. Trotsky retorted<br />

irritably:<br />

It is said among you that in <strong>the</strong> present civil or small war ...<br />

military science has no role, in any case. I am telling you, Jlvfessieurs<br />

<strong>the</strong> military specialists, that this is an altoge<strong>the</strong>r ignorant<br />

statement. ... Civil war, with its highly mobile and elastic fronts,<br />

affords enormous scope to genuine initiative and military art.<br />

The task is just <strong>the</strong> same here as elsewhere: To obtain <strong>the</strong> maximum<br />

result through a minimum expenditure of strength ....<br />

It was precisely <strong>the</strong> last [world] war ... that offered relatively<br />

little scope to strategic art. After <strong>the</strong> gigantic front from <strong>the</strong> Belgian<br />

coast to Switzerland had become fixed, <strong>the</strong> war became automatic.<br />

Strategic art was reduced to a minimum; everything was staked<br />

on mutual attrition. Our war, on <strong>the</strong> contrary, has been full of<br />

mobility and mana:uvre which allowed <strong>the</strong> greatest talents to<br />

reveal <strong>the</strong>mselves .... 1<br />

While <strong>the</strong> old generals refused to learn <strong>the</strong> lessons of <strong>the</strong> civil<br />

war, <strong>the</strong> young ones were often reluctant to learn anything else.<br />

Their ambition was to construct a brand-new 'proletarian military<br />

' Trotsky, op. cit., vol. iii, book 1, p. 156.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!