12.04.2015 Views

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE PROPHET ARMED<br />

Differences on broader issues still separated Trotsky from Lenin.<br />

There was, first, <strong>the</strong> disagreement over revolutionary drfeatism.<br />

'The revolution is not interested in any fur<strong>the</strong>r accumulation of<br />

defeats', Trotsky wrote, while Lenin expounded <strong>the</strong> view that<br />

Russia's military defeat would favour revolution. On <strong>the</strong> face<br />

of it, two extremely opposed views seem to clash here; and so <strong>the</strong><br />

Stalinist historians present <strong>the</strong> story. Actually <strong>the</strong> difference was<br />

one of propagandist emphasis, not of policy. Both Lenin and<br />

Trotsky urged Socialists to turn <strong>the</strong> war into a revolution and to<br />

spread <strong>the</strong>ir ideas and views among workers and in <strong>the</strong> <strong>armed</strong><br />

forces, even if this should weaken <strong>the</strong>ir country militarily. Both<br />

agreed that <strong>the</strong> fear of national defeat should not defiect <strong>the</strong><br />

Socialist from doing his duty. For all <strong>the</strong> provocative emphasis<br />

which Lenin gave to his defeatism, he did not ask his followers<br />

to engage, or to encourage o<strong>the</strong>rs to engage, in sabotage,<br />

desertion, or o<strong>the</strong>r strictly defeatist activities. He merely argued<br />

that although revolutionary agitation would weaken Russia's<br />

military strength, Russian Socialists were bound in duty and<br />

honour to take this risk in <strong>the</strong> hope that German revolutionaries<br />

would do <strong>the</strong> same so that in <strong>the</strong> end all <strong>the</strong> imperialist governments<br />

would be vanquished by <strong>the</strong> joint efforts of <strong>the</strong> internationalists.<br />

The defeat of any one country would thus prove<br />

only an incident in <strong>the</strong> revolution's advance from country to<br />

country. Trotsky, and with him many of Lenin's own followers,<br />

refused to tie <strong>the</strong> fortunes of revolution so exclusively to defeat. 1<br />

It was enough, Trotsky argued, to preach and prepare revolution,<br />

no matter what <strong>the</strong> military situation. Each attitude had,<br />

from <strong>the</strong> viewpoint of those who held it, its advantages and<br />

disadvantages. Trotsky's non-defeatism did not in advance<br />

expose <strong>the</strong> internationalist to <strong>the</strong> charge that he was giving aid<br />

and comfort to <strong>the</strong> enemy. Lenin's attitude, for all its obvious<br />

tactical inconvenience, was better calculated to make <strong>the</strong><br />

revolutionary immune from warlike patriotism and to erect an<br />

insurmountable barrier between him and his adversaries. In<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!