12.04.2015 Views

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

isaac-deutscher-the-prophet-armed-trotsky-1879-1921

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DOLDRUMS: 1907-1914 199<br />

chaos an.cl confusion'. He called upon <strong>the</strong> editor of <strong>the</strong> Bolshevik<br />

paper to change its name within a given time; and he threatened<br />

meaningfully: 'W c wait quietly for an answer before we undertake<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r steps.'' He apparently sent a similar ultimatum<br />

directly to <strong>the</strong> Bolshevik editorial offices. He had no inkling that<br />

<strong>the</strong> man who set up <strong>the</strong> rival paper in Petersburg and issued its<br />

first copy was <strong>the</strong> little-known Bolshevik Joseph Djugashvili, <strong>the</strong><br />

man who would in <strong>the</strong> future similarly expropriate him of<br />

glories greater than <strong>the</strong> editorship of Pravda-- of <strong>the</strong> titles of <strong>the</strong><br />

leader of <strong>the</strong> revolution and <strong>the</strong> founder of <strong>the</strong> Red Army.<br />

Yet it would be wrong to blame <strong>the</strong> plagiarism on to Stalin<br />

alone. Lenin wholeheartedly approved it; and in a letter to<br />

Petersburg he wrote: 'I advise you to answer Trotsky in <strong>the</strong><br />

column "Answers to Readers" as follows: "To Trotsky in Vienna:<br />

We shall leave your quibbling and pettifogging letters without<br />

reply.''" One can easily guess how Lenin justified <strong>the</strong> plagiarism<br />

to himself: <strong>the</strong> Central Committee had subsidized Pravda; <strong>the</strong><br />

title and <strong>the</strong> goodwill of <strong>the</strong> paper belonged to <strong>the</strong> party, not<br />

to Trotsky; and since <strong>the</strong> Bolsheviks were <strong>the</strong> party, <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

entitled to appropriate <strong>the</strong> paper's name. This was a lame<br />

excuse, even though such quarrels over titles occurred in all<br />

cmigrc groups. Trotsky threatened to take fur<strong>the</strong>r steps; but<br />

it seems that he took none, and he ceased to publish his Pravda,<br />

while <strong>the</strong> Bolshevik paper under its stolen name embarked on a<br />

long and famous career. In 1922, when Pravda celebrated its<br />

tenth anniversary, Trotsky took part in <strong>the</strong> celebration and<br />

contributed an article in which he did not even hint at <strong>the</strong><br />

paper's origin.<br />

The fact that Socialists could now openly publish dailies in<br />

Petersburg (<strong>the</strong> Menshcviks were publishing Luch-The Torchwhich<br />

counted Trotsky among its contributors) showed a<br />

significant change in Russia. The years of reaction were over;<br />

<strong>the</strong> terror had spent itself; <strong>the</strong> Labour movement was experiencing<br />

a new revival; and, willy-nilly, Tsardom had to put up with<br />

it. A new generation of revolutionaries was coming of age<br />

and flocking into <strong>the</strong> few openly existing workers' clubs and<br />

trade unions and into <strong>the</strong> clandestine organizations. The new<br />

1<br />

Pravda, no. 25. (From now on all references to Pravda are to <strong>the</strong> Bolshevik<br />

paper, unless it is stated o<strong>the</strong>rwise.)<br />

2<br />

Lenin, Sochinenya, vol. xxxv, p. 1 j.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!