27.04.2015 Views

Bellingham Comments from Digital Recorder - EISs for the Proposed ...

Bellingham Comments from Digital Recorder - EISs for the Proposed ...

Bellingham Comments from Digital Recorder - EISs for the Proposed ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GATEWAY PACIFIC TERMINAL EIS SCOPING HEARING VOL. II<br />

COURT REPORTER: BETH DRUMMOND PROCEEDING DATE: October 27, 2012<br />

Page 23<br />

1 prove significant health effects to exposure to everyday<br />

2 pollutant levels that are below national EPA guidelines.<br />

3 The data show, in any effect, no specific safe<br />

4 threshold. A recent study <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Environmental<br />

5 Protection Agency states that <strong>the</strong> Puget Sound region ranks<br />

6 in <strong>the</strong> country's top five percent of risk <strong>for</strong> exposure to<br />

7 toxic air pollution.<br />

8 A study in 2010 by <strong>the</strong> Puget Sound Clean Air<br />

9 Committee in New York City and Washington showed that diesel<br />

10 emissions remain <strong>the</strong> largest contributor to potential cancer<br />

11 risks in <strong>the</strong> Puget Sound area.<br />

12 A recent health assessment was done in Spokane to<br />

13 assess cancer risk <strong>from</strong> diesel particulate matter in <strong>the</strong><br />

14 areas surrounding <strong>the</strong> Burlington Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Railroad in<br />

15 Spokane. And <strong>the</strong>y concluded that <strong>the</strong>re was a several-fold<br />

16 increase in risk to develop cancer in <strong>the</strong> neighborhoods<br />

17 surrounding <strong>the</strong> rail yard.<br />

18 So I request that <strong>the</strong> scoping include <strong>the</strong><br />

19 analysis of <strong>the</strong> increased risk of cancer in terms that are<br />

20 easy to understand by <strong>the</strong> public. Because <strong>the</strong> rail lines<br />

21 transect most needed population centers in Washington and<br />

22 Montana and Idaho, <strong>the</strong>se need to be included in <strong>the</strong><br />

23 analysis.<br />

24 From a physician's perspective, it would be<br />

25 unethical and irresponsible to exclude communities <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!