18.11.2012 Views

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

vision of necessary individual moral restraint and Fourier’s utopian leap to the inevitable,<br />

communal realization of God-instilled passions.<br />

The Jewish Other in Europe and Britain<br />

The role of the Jewish other stands as a decisive factor in European divisions between<br />

civic and ethnic nationalisms. William Brustein, in a recent quantitative study of antisemitism in<br />

Europe, compared attitudes in print toward Jews with antisemitic acts, legal and otherwise,<br />

recorded from 1899 to 1939 in Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Romania. Besides the<br />

salience of economic troubles, increased Jewish immigration and growth of the political Left in<br />

fomenting antisemitism, Brustein’s quantitative analysis revealed telling spatial and temporal<br />

variations between act and opinion. 54 French antisemitism appears to have been relatively non-<br />

activist and not the hotbed of anti-Jewish activity supposed from the Dreyfus Affair or years<br />

preceding Vichy government—a diagnosis supportive of Rogers Brubaker’s work on<br />

Franco/German citizenship differences. 55 But perhaps more interesting, the greater incidence and<br />

violence of antisemitic acts in Germany and Romania did not broadly coincide with unfavorable<br />

54 Roots of Hate: Anti-Semitism in Europe before the Holocaust (Cambridge, UK ; New<br />

York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 10, 12, 34. Antisemitic acts numbered as follows:<br />

Britain (73), France (49), Germany (709), Romania (431) and Italy (39), 401 of the German<br />

antisemitic acts having occurred under the Nazi regime. Brustein used the American Jewish Year<br />

Book for a primary record of antisemitic acts and a random sampling of two major newspapers in<br />

each country for an index of attitudes. He coded as favorable, unfavorable or neutral all<br />

reportage on Jews in these ten selected newspapers for the 15 th of each month between 1899 and<br />

1939. Temporal variation within the time frame appears in two series of graphs: one for<br />

antisemitic acts, both in toto and differentiated by country (pp. 15, 16); the second for attitudes<br />

during the periods 1899-1913, 1914-1923, 1924-1932 and 1933-1939 (pp. 26-29).<br />

55 Ibid., 337. Brubaker only lightly touched on the issue of antisemitism in relation to<br />

national identity, explicitly to highlight the French adherence to, and German rejection of, jus<br />

soli during a period of intensified anti-Jewish feeling throughout Europe. See Citizenship and<br />

Nationhood, 12, 102, 135-36<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!