18.11.2012 Views

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Anglo-German Colonial Rivalry<br />

The advent of German colonial rivalry, joining Belgian and French, became a thorn in the<br />

flesh for British imperial pretensions, a likelihood foreseen by Bismarck who nevertheless<br />

acceded to popular expansionism during the mid-1880s and, by exploiting Anglo-French disputes<br />

over control of Egypt, gained territorial concessions in West Africa, the Cameroons and<br />

Togoland. 1 These and later German incursions into the hinterlands of East Africa, as well as<br />

intrigues involving the Sultan of Zanzibar within Britain’s perceived sphere of influence, brought<br />

forth angry reactions in the press against the British government’s apparent complacency in<br />

defending its own interests. With the Anglo-German Agreement of 1890, Germany gave up<br />

claims to Uganda and Witu on the East African coast in exchange for Heligoland, a small island<br />

in the North Sea near the mouth of the Elbe and of no strategic importance to Britain. The<br />

frontiers of German and British East Africa were also extended west of Lake Victoria to the<br />

Congo State. The 1890 Agreement, which actually settled territorial disputes in East Africa to<br />

Britain’s advantage, was disparaged as a “policy of surrender” and “a melancholy monument<br />

erected over the grave of our lost opportunities.” 2 Opposition to the Anglo-German Agreement<br />

also focused on the moral consequences of handing 2000 Heligolanders “over to the tender<br />

mercies of German militarism.” 3<br />

1 Kennedy, Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism, 180.<br />

2 V. Lovett Cameron, “England and Germany in Africa,” pt. 2, Fortnightly Review 48<br />

(July 1890): 129. In a postscript to the article, which was written before the agreement was<br />

signed, the Fortnightly’s editor regretted not having been able to “substitute congratulation for<br />

criticism” of Britain’s “humiliating capitulation.” (pp. 163-4). See also “Progress of the World:<br />

The Anglo-German Agreement,” Review of Reviews 2 (July 1890): 5.<br />

3 “Progress of the World: The Anglo-German Agreement,” 8. The Heligolanders were<br />

given the option of assuming English nationality.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!