18.11.2012 Views

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

component of imperialism to which comparative craniologies and evangelical missions lent an<br />

air of scientific and moral validity. The “romantic racism” that defined an intra-European<br />

hierarchy based on national character merely represented the upper tier of a broader prejudice<br />

against “primitive” non-Europeans who lacked any claim to a “civilized” past and thus became<br />

the hapless victims of imperial “philanthropy.” 62 Placement of British Anglo-Saxons at the top<br />

of this racial hierarchy, whether by virtue of “pure” Aryan lineage or a wholesome European<br />

racial synthesis, provided an organic rationale for imperial hegemony to which the United States,<br />

not Germany, could logically be seen as Britain’s Anglo-Saxon heir apparent.<br />

While stereotypes served as building blocks for a hierarchical world view, which<br />

temporarily reduced anxiety and increased “self-esteem” through the denigration of other<br />

nationalities, they also embodied categorical “truths” which ultimately supported a pseudo-<br />

biological, “Darwinian” interpretation of world history. 63 Well before the publication of<br />

Darwin’s Origin of Species in 1859, theories about social evolution, lacking any scientific basis,<br />

maintained contemporary conservative racist and sexist ideologies. 64 Blunt statements about the<br />

62 Christine Bolt, “Race and the Victorians,” in Eldridge, British Imperialism in the<br />

Nineteenth Century, 127-30. Stein, From Metaphor to Meaning, 131, also notes the tendency<br />

among early ethnologists to distinguish between “primitive” and “modern” races. In the case of<br />

Macnamara, Origin of the English People, 192-97, the division between the dolichocephalic or<br />

“long-headed” races, including the Iberian and the Teutonic or Aryan (Nordic) subtypes, and the<br />

brachycephalic or “broad-skulled” Mongolian peoples defined a human family tree of<br />

generalized anatomical and national character distinctions.<br />

63 Bolt, “Race and the Victorians,” 130-31. See Adorno, Authoritarian Personality, 807,<br />

and Forbes, Nationalism, Ethnocentrism and Personality, 32, on the externalization of values<br />

projected in stereotypes which offers at best only a temporary escape from self-examination and<br />

anxiety.<br />

64 Peter Dickens, Social Darwinism: Linking Evolutionary Thought to Social Theory<br />

(Buckingham, UK; Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2000), 7-8, 15, 19, 21, refers mainly to<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!