18.11.2012 Views

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

BRITISH IDENTITY AND THE GERMAN OTHER A Dissertation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a free hand toward Europe and failure to adopt policies that might have averted war, namely the<br />

maintenance of Austrian integrity and a power balance in the Balkans, have been also been<br />

deemed symptomatic of a universal, imperialistic short-sightedness. 49 To the latter point, R. J.<br />

Crampton has shown that attempts to improve Anglo-German relations through cooperation on<br />

the periphery, specifically via efforts to quell nationalist and territorial squabbles in the Balkans,<br />

signally failed to address more substantive issues concerning military and diplomatic<br />

commitments. The collapse of a short-lived Anglo-German “hollow detente” during the Balkan<br />

wars of 1912-13, Crampton concluded, reflected the inability of the great powers to stray from<br />

alliances that constituted a larger European crisis. 50 As to the policy of the free hand, Gordon<br />

Martel has concluded that Britain’s default policy of non-alliance actually offered the best<br />

strategy for balancing the Central Powers’ Triple Alliance against the Franco-Russian Dual<br />

Entente. Lord Rosebery’s invasion and control of Egypt through the Khedive in 1892, besides<br />

securing the Suez Canal and a route to India, established a British presence in the Eastern<br />

Mediterranean that could check French and Russian imperial ambitions while Britain could enjoy<br />

an automatic security in the military standoff between the two European alliances on the<br />

Continent. According to Martel, Britain’s built-in relationship with Germany as a tacit member<br />

of the Triple Alliance depended upon assurances that Italy and Austria-Hungary could rely on a<br />

49 Paul Schroeder, “World War I as Galloping Gertie: A Reply to Joachim Remak,”<br />

Journal of Modern History 44 (September 1972): 344-45.<br />

50 British diplomats found that Germany would neither part with Austria and Italy on the<br />

protection of Albania’s coastline from Greek incursions nor jeopardize commercial and military<br />

ties with the Ottomans for a coerced compensatory surrender of Turkish-owned Aegean islands<br />

to Greece. This impasse left Britain without support on the one issue that mattered: control of<br />

the Eastern Mediterranean and a possible launching point for involvement in any European<br />

scramble for Asiatic Ottoman territories. The Hollow Detente: Anglo-German Relations in the<br />

Balkans, 1911-1914 (London: Prior; Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1979), 123-25, 174-75.<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!