You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>the</strong> Golden Rule, "Thou Shalt Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself<br />
(Lev. 19:18)" only <strong>to</strong> Jews and not <strong>to</strong> Christians as Rabbi<br />
Jonathan Eibeschutz does. 242<br />
To fur<strong>the</strong>r his deception, Jonathan Eibeschutz meanwhile<br />
was constantly attacking <strong>the</strong> Sabbatians. When he was Rabbi<br />
in Prague, he went so far as <strong>to</strong> publicly pronounce a ban of<br />
excommunication against <strong>the</strong>m, and when <strong>the</strong> yeshiva<br />
violence <strong>to</strong>ok place, Eibeschutz "played dumb." He couldn't<br />
understand why good yeshiva students should fight <strong>the</strong><br />
students of Rabbi Oppenheim, so <strong>the</strong> fights continued without<br />
subsiding, until <strong>the</strong> imperial edict.<br />
Among <strong>the</strong> more dangerous and famous Biblical critics we<br />
can list Johann David Michaelis (1717-1791). 243 Michaelis was<br />
very active as a writer, a <strong>the</strong>ologian, Orientalist and Biblical<br />
critic. His main publishing activity was that of Edi<strong>to</strong>r of <strong>the</strong><br />
Biblical exegesis journal of his day. He denigrated Jews. 244<br />
Initially he gave Mendelssohn good reviews, 245 but argued with<br />
him extensively later on. It is possible that his arguments with<br />
Mendelssohn were merely conspira<strong>to</strong>rial in character, and<br />
were meant <strong>to</strong> serve as excuses for Mendelssohn <strong>to</strong> become<br />
famous as a great spokesman for Jewish emancipation,<br />
because while Michaelis made public remarks of an anti-<br />
Semitic nature, Mendelssohn considered Michaelis <strong>to</strong> be an<br />
ally when it came <strong>to</strong> Scripture from <strong>the</strong> aspect of non-dogmatic<br />
exegesis. 246<br />
An interesting example of where Mendelssohn and<br />
Michaelis locked horns was when Michaelis tried <strong>to</strong> prove<br />
statistically that Jews were twenty-five times as corrupt as<br />
Germans with respect <strong>to</strong> thievery. Mendelssohn's reply has<br />
been summarized by Altmann as follows: 247<br />
"If a nation's depravity was <strong>to</strong> be assessed, he declared, it<br />
was necessary <strong>to</strong> take in<strong>to</strong> account murderers, highwaymen,<br />
trai<strong>to</strong>rs, arsonists, adulterers, harlots, infanticides, etc.—not<br />
thieves alone. But even under <strong>the</strong> erroneous assumption that<br />
only thieves and dealers in s<strong>to</strong>len goods were an index of a<br />
132