Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development ...
Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development ...
Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ENGINEERING: ISSUES CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT Warsaw University ofTechnology.© Polish Federation of <strong>Engineering</strong>Associations (NOT)modified by preparations <strong>for</strong> the European Football Championshipin 2012. The most important part of the preparationshas become the building of new transport routes in accordancewith the most modern engineering st<strong>and</strong>ards. Nevertheless,the need <strong>for</strong> housing, communications <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mationtechnology still remain social <strong>and</strong> engineering priorities.In view of the national strategy, the Polish PFEA sets as its primarygoal to continue to provide a high level of support <strong>for</strong>technological progress in small- <strong>and</strong> medium-sized businesses(which employ two-thirds of the work<strong>for</strong>ce in Pol<strong>and</strong>). ThePFEA has taken on the constant task to strive towards a rapidincrease in the level of engineering initiative, especially aimedat achieving a high rate of innovation among all engineers, particularlyamongst its members, <strong>for</strong> the benefit of all society.The leading motto of all Polish engineers, in both good <strong>and</strong>bad periods of Polish history, has remained, ‘Here <strong>and</strong> now nota day goes by without progress – <strong>for</strong> the country of our fathers,<strong>for</strong> the Polish nation <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> all the people of Earth.’5.3.5USACharles VestThe Americas <strong>and</strong> Caribbean<strong>Engineering</strong> fuelled the United States’ rise to global economic<strong>and</strong> geopolitical leadership during the latter half ofthe nineteenth century <strong>and</strong> first half of the twentieth century.<strong>Engineering</strong> research <strong>and</strong> practice led to the creation of technologiesthat have increased life expectancy, driven economicgrowth <strong>and</strong> improved the quality of life of U.S. citizens <strong>and</strong>people around the world. The products, systems <strong>and</strong> servicesdeveloped by U.S. engineers are essential to security, publichealth <strong>and</strong> the economic competitiveness of American business<strong>and</strong> industry. In the future, the U.S. engineering enterprisewill generate technological innovations to address <strong>challenges</strong>in the areas of economic recovery – af<strong>for</strong>dable healthcare, sustainableenergy sources, sufficient water supplies <strong>and</strong> globalsecurity.The strength of engineering enterprise in the U.S. has severalhistorical roots. The production dem<strong>and</strong>s of two world wars<strong>and</strong> the massive government works projects during the 1930scontributed to the rapid growth of engineering capability inboth practice <strong>and</strong> research, in addition to its contribution tothe U.S.’s burgeoning industrial strength <strong>and</strong> economic dynamismprior to 1945. In the aftermath of the Second World War,the American government invested in basic science, engineeringresearch <strong>and</strong> in higher education. It combined this withlarge-scale government expenditure on applied research <strong>and</strong>on advanced technology <strong>development</strong> <strong>and</strong> procurement. Thiswas mainly to meet national security needs. This approachaccelerated the growth of the U.S. engineering enterprise ina large, diverse, distributed <strong>and</strong> open national innovation system,populated by a vast number of universities, governmentlaboratories, private non-profit laboratories as well as privatecompanies.The role of higher education <strong>and</strong> research in the U.S.A particular contribution to the engineering prowess of theUnited States was the excellence <strong>and</strong> effectiveness of its highereducation system. This consists of a diverse array of institutions,ranging from two-year community colleges through tosmall liberal arts colleges <strong>and</strong> to research-intensive universities(both public <strong>and</strong> private). Such diversity provides a wealthof environments <strong>and</strong> <strong>opportunities</strong> <strong>for</strong> students to select aschool that best matches their needs <strong>and</strong> capabilities, <strong>and</strong> alsorepresents a wide range of funding sources. This strength wassubstantially leveraged by a tremendous expansion of accessto higher education subsequent to the Second World War. Itwas a means to provide useful activity <strong>and</strong> skills training toa large number of returning soldiers, it supported economic<strong>development</strong> in the growing western states, <strong>and</strong> it supportedthe continued research <strong>and</strong> <strong>development</strong> needs of government<strong>and</strong> industry. This government–university partnershiphas trans<strong>for</strong>med American universities, has been remarkablyproductive, <strong>and</strong> has made the country a world leader inresearch-intensive engineering <strong>and</strong> science education.Strengths of the engineering work<strong>for</strong>ce in the U.S.In addition to the strength of engineering education <strong>and</strong> theproductivity of American research universities, several otherfactors have contributed significantly to the high quality,mobility, accessibility <strong>and</strong> entrepreneurial nature of the USengineering <strong>and</strong> technical work<strong>for</strong>ce. These include:■■■A highly individualistic, entrepreneurial culture nurturedin U.S. industry <strong>and</strong> in many U.S. research universities byprivate practices, public policies <strong>and</strong> various institutionalmechanisms, such as technology business incubators <strong>and</strong>venture capital firms that encourage risk-taking.A history of regulatory <strong>and</strong> other public policy commitmentsconducive to high-tech start-up companies, includingthe competition-oriented or technology diffusion-orienteden<strong>for</strong>cement of intellectual property rights <strong>and</strong> antitrustlaw (competition policy), as well as a relatively risk-friendlysystem of company law, particularly bankruptcy law.A strong indigenous talent base that has been continuously<strong>and</strong> richly augmented by a large <strong>and</strong> diverse supplyof talented scientists <strong>and</strong> engineers from other countries.The openness of U.S. campuses, laboratories <strong>and</strong> companiesto talented men <strong>and</strong> women from other nations in sci-236