10.07.2015 Views

Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development ...

Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development ...

Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENGINEERING: ISSUES CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEVELOPMENTFigure 4: The fundamental differences between the‘green’ <strong>and</strong> ‘brown’ agendasNORTHGREEN AGENDABROWN AGENDAEcosystemicwell-beingKey concern Human well-beingForever Time frame ImmediateLocal to global Scale LocalFuture generations Concerned about Low income groupsProtect an work with Nature Manipulated <strong>and</strong> useUse less Services Provide moreAffluence <strong>and</strong> overconsumptionPoverty <strong>and</strong>under<strong>development</strong>On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the so-called ‘brown’ agenda focuses onpoverty <strong>and</strong> under <strong>development</strong>. As such, it addresses theneed to reduce the environmental threats to health that arisefrom poor sanitary conditions, crowding, inadequate waterprovision, hazardous air <strong>and</strong> water pollution, <strong>and</strong> the accumulationof solid waste. It is generally more pertinent in poor,under-serviced cities or regions.Linking the MDGs to st<strong>and</strong>ardsThe link between the application of knowledge in engineering<strong>and</strong> technology <strong>and</strong> the reduction of poverty through sustainableeconomic <strong>and</strong> social <strong>development</strong> is well understood.The importance of the exchange of knowledge in engineering<strong>and</strong> technology transfer is also understood. What is notunderstood is the linkage of st<strong>and</strong>ards, indigenous engineeringpractice <strong>and</strong> economic <strong>development</strong>.The International St<strong>and</strong>ardization Organization (ISO) has 157member countries. Developing countries comprise 65 per centof its member bodies, 94 per cent of its corresponding members<strong>and</strong> 100 per cent of its subscriber members. One of ISO’sseven key objectives <strong>for</strong> 2010 relate to facilitating developingcountry participation in the <strong>development</strong> of internationalst<strong>and</strong>ards. Yet the participation of such countries in ISO workinggroups <strong>and</strong> technical committees is generally very poor.Frequently st<strong>and</strong>ards are written without direct input fromany developing country.St<strong>and</strong>ards are the tools of engineers. <strong>Engineering</strong> practice isaccordingly shaped by those who draft st<strong>and</strong>ards, yet very littleattention <strong>and</strong> investment is given to st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>development</strong>in developing countries. Much is given to research <strong>and</strong>capacity-building without considering the means of communicatingthe practical outcomes of research <strong>and</strong> the basis <strong>for</strong>practice, namely st<strong>and</strong>ards.MDGs will only become an integral part of the st<strong>and</strong>ardsagenda when the role that st<strong>and</strong>ards play in economic <strong>development</strong>is understood, <strong>and</strong> developing countries have boththe capability <strong>and</strong> capacity to develop their own st<strong>and</strong>ards<strong>and</strong> also to participate fully in the <strong>development</strong> of internationalst<strong>and</strong>ards.SOUTH6.1.8Climate change: technology,mitigation, adaptationRajendra Kumar PachauriBackgroundScience, engineering <strong>and</strong> technology are of particular importancein the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.They are the knowledge basis on which policies <strong>and</strong> actions tomitigate <strong>and</strong> adapt to climate change are made. Science is vitalin the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of climate change <strong>and</strong> the complex interrelationshipbetween human activities <strong>and</strong> the environment.<strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>and</strong> technology are vital in providing solutions <strong>for</strong>mitigation <strong>and</strong> adaptation. In terms of underst<strong>and</strong>ing climatechange, major findings of the IPCC Fourth Assessment reportindicate that the mean global temperature has unequivocallyincreased since the beginning of industrialization, by about0.74ºC, <strong>and</strong> that this increase has accelerated in recent years (Figure1). Another major finding is that the sea level has risen by17 cm in the twentieth century, most particularly over the last10–15 years. These effects are not uni<strong>for</strong>m, the Arctic <strong>for</strong> exampleis warming at twice the rate as the rest of the world, with higherimpact on associated flora <strong>and</strong> fauna such as the polar bear.The Fourth Assessment Report also indicated that humanactivity is ‘very likely’ the reason <strong>for</strong> global warming over thelast fifty years (up from ‘likely’ in the Third Assessment Report).The level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, one of the majordrivers of climate change, has increased over the last 650,000years (Figure 2). At the observable level, glaciers have beenin retreat <strong>for</strong> over a century. There are also changes in averageprecipitation, increasing on average in temperate regionswhile declining in tropical, sub-tropical <strong>and</strong> the Mediterraneanregions, with a significant increase in extreme precipitationevents. Changes in precipitation patterns, along with theincrease in extreme temperature conditions, will have obviousimpacts in terms of drought, flooding, heatwaves <strong>and</strong> fires.Urgent need <strong>for</strong> actionNegotiations are, of course, at an advanced stage to arrive atan agreement beyond the end of the first commitment periodof the Kyoto Protocol in 2012, <strong>and</strong> one important element orconcern with regard to how to develop a suitable <strong>and</strong> effectiveagreement is contained in Article 2 of the UN framework onclimate change. This Article essentially states as the ultimateobjective of the Convention our ability to prevent a dangerouslevel of anthropogenic interference with climate change,<strong>and</strong> this would focus on <strong>issues</strong> like food security <strong>and</strong> the abilityof ecosystems to be able to rebound once we create a certainlevel of damage through climate change. While underst<strong>and</strong>ingthat defining ‘dangerous’ is a value judgement, science cancertainly provide a basis by which the international communitycan come up with a definition of what would constitute adangerous level of climate change.266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!