23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

114 Marco Brunella<br />

lifted to �Lt). Then we can repeat the argument above: the fiberwise iterated integral<br />

of ( �ω1, �ω2) is a holomorphic function on UT which separates p and q. ⊓⊔<br />

Having established that UT is a holomorphically separable Riemann domain over<br />

V T , it is again a fundamental result of Cartan-Thullen-Oka theory [GuR] that there<br />

exists a Stein Riemann domain<br />

FT : U T → V T<br />

which contains UT and such that O(U T )=O(UT ). ThemapPT : UT → T extends<br />

to<br />

PT : UT → T,<br />

and UT can be identified with the open subset of U T composed by the connected<br />

components of fibers of PT which cut Ω ⊂ U T . But, in fact, much better is true:<br />

Lemma 2.6. Every fiber of PT is connected, that is:<br />

UT = UT .<br />

Proof. If not, then, by a connectivity argument, we may find a0,b0 ∈ P −1<br />

T (t0),<br />

ak,bk ∈ P −1<br />

T (tk), with ak → a0 and bk → b0, such that:<br />

(i) a0 ∈ �Lt0 , b0 ∈ P −1<br />

T (t0) \ �Lt0 ;<br />

(ii) ak,bk ∈ �Lt k .<br />

Denote by Mt0 the maximal ideal of Ot0 (on T ), and for every p ∈ P−1 T (t0) denote by<br />

Ip ⊂ Op the ideal generated by (PT ) ∗ (Mt0 ). At points of �Lt0 , this is just the ideal of<br />

functions vanishing along �Lt0 ; whereas at points of P−1 T (t0) \ �Lt0 ,atwhichPTmay fail to be a submersion, this ideal may correspond to a “higher order” vanishing.<br />

Because UT is Stein and P −1<br />

T (t0) is a closed subvariety, we may find a holomorphic<br />

function f ∈ O(U T ) such that:<br />

(iii) f ≡ 0on�Lt0 , f ≡ 1onP−1 T (t0) \ �Lt0 ;<br />

(iv) for every p ∈ P −1<br />

T (t0), the differential dfp of f at p belongs to the ideal IpΩ 1 p.<br />

Let {z1,...,zn−1} denote the coordinates on T lifted to UT . Then, by property (iv),<br />

we can factorize<br />

n−1<br />

df =<br />

∑<br />

j=1<br />

(z j − z j(t0)) · β j<br />

where β j are holomorphic 1-forms on U T .<br />

As in Lemma 2.5, each β j can be integrated along the simply connected fibers of<br />

UT (with starting point on T), giving a function g j ∈ O(UT ). This function can be<br />

holomorphically extended to the envelope UT . By the factorization above, and (ii),<br />

we have<br />

n−1<br />

f (bk) − f (ak)=<br />

∑<br />

j=1<br />

(z j(tk) − z j(t0)) · (g j(bk) − g j(ak))

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!