23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Uniformisation of Foliations by Curves 157<br />

Proof. By the discussion above (local triviality of UF along the leaves), the first<br />

statement is equivalent to say that, if T ⊂ X 0 is a small transversal (say, isomorphic<br />

to D n−1 ), then UT � T × C.<br />

We use for this Theorem 2.3 of Section 2. We may assume that there exists an<br />

embedding T × D j → UT sending fibers to fibers and T ×{0} to pT (T ).Thenweset<br />

U ε T = UT \{j(T × D(ε))}.<br />

In order to apply Theorem 2.3, we need to prove that the fiberwise Poincaré metric<br />

on U ε T has a plurisubharmonic variation, for every ε > 0 small.<br />

But this follows from Theorem 5.1 in exactly the same way as we did in<br />

Proposition 6.2 of Section 6. We just replace, in that proof, the open subsets Ω j ⊂ US<br />

(for S ⊂ T a generic disc) with<br />

Then the fibration Ω ε j<br />

Ω ε j = Ω j \{j(S × D(ε))}.<br />

→ S is, for j large, a fibration by annuli, and its boundary in US<br />

has two components: one is the Levi flat Mj, and the other one is the Levi-flat j(S ×<br />

∂D(ε)). Then Theorem 2.1 of Section 2, or more simply the annular generalization<br />

of Proposition 2.2, gives the desired plurisubharmonic variation on Ω ε j , and then on<br />

U ε S by passing to the limit, and finally on U ε T by varying S.<br />

Hence UT � T × C and UF is a locally trivial C-fibration over X 0 .<br />

Let us now define explicitely the isomorphism between UF and the total space<br />

EF of TF over X 0 .<br />

Take p ∈ X 0 and let vp ∈ EF be a point over p. Thenvpisa tangent vector<br />

to Lp at p, and it can be lifted to �Lp as a tangent vector �vp at p. Suppose �vp �= 0.<br />

Then, because �Lp � C, �vp can be extended, in a uniquely defined way, to a complete<br />

holomorphic and nowhere vanishing vector field �v on �Lp. If, instead, we have<br />

�vp = 0, then we set �v ≡ 0. Take q ∈ �Lp equal to the image of p by the time-one flow<br />

of �v. We have in this way defined a map (EF )p → �Lp, vp ↦→ q, which obviously<br />

is an isomorphism, sending the origin of (EF )p to the basepoint of �Lp. Inother<br />

words: because Lp is parabolic, we have a canonically defined isomorphism between<br />

(TpLp,0) and (�Lp, p).<br />

By varying p in X 0 , we thus have a bijective map<br />

EF | X 0 → UF<br />

sending the null section to pF (X 0 ), and we need to verify that this map is holomorphic.<br />

This follows from the fact that UF (and EF also, of course) is a locally<br />

trivial fibration. In terms of the previous construction, we take a local transversal<br />

T ⊂ X 0 and a nowhere vanishing holomorphic section vp, p ∈ T ,ofEF over T .<br />

The previous construction gives a vertical vector field �v on UT ,whichis,onevery<br />

fiber, complete holomorphic and nowhere vanishing, and moreover it is holomorphic<br />

along pT (T ) ⊂ UT . After a trivialization UT � T × C, sending pT (T ) to {w = 0},<br />

this vertical vector field �v becomes something like F(z,w) ∂<br />

∂w , with F nowhere

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!