23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 Marco Abate<br />

In [ABT1] we proved that ν f does not depend on p,andthat<br />

ν f = min<br />

j=1,...,n ν f (z j; p),<br />

where (U,z) is any local chart centered at p ∈ E and z =(z1,...,zn). In particular, if<br />

the local chart (U,z) is such that E ∩U = {z1 = 0} (and we shall say that the local<br />

chart is adapted to E) then setting f j = z j ◦ f we can write<br />

f j(z)=z j +(z1) ν f g j(z), (42)<br />

where at least one among g1,...,gn does not vanish identically on U ∩ E.<br />

Definition 6.21. Amap f ∈ End(M,E) is tangential to E if<br />

min � ν f (h; p) | h ∈ IE,p<br />

for some (and hence any) point p ∈ E.<br />

� > ν f<br />

Choosing a local chart (U,z) adapted to E so that we can express the coordinates<br />

of f in the form (42), it turns out that f is tangential if and only if g1 |U∩E ≡ 0.<br />

The g j ’s in (42) depend in general on the chosen chart; however, in [ABT1] we<br />

proved that setting<br />

X f =<br />

n ∂<br />

∑ g j<br />

j=1 ∂z j<br />

⊗ (dz1) ⊗ν f (43)<br />

then X f |U∩E defines a global section Xf of the bundle TM|E ⊗ (N∗ E )⊗ν f ,whereN∗ E<br />

is the conormal bundle of E into M. The bundle TM|E ⊗ (N∗ E )⊗ν f is canonically<br />

isomorphic to the bundle Hom(N ⊗ν f<br />

E ,TM|E). Therefore the section Xf induces a<br />

morphism still denoted by Xf : N ⊗ν f<br />

E → TM|E.<br />

Definition 6.22. The morphism Xf : N ⊗ν f<br />

E → TM|E just defined is the canonical<br />

morphism associated to f ∈ End(M,E).<br />

Remark 6.23. It is easy to check that f is tangential if and only if the image of<br />

Xf is contained in TE.Furthermore,iffis the lifting of a germ fo ∈ End(Cn ,O)<br />

tangent to the identity, then (see [ABT1]) f is tangential if and only if fo is nondicritical;<br />

so in this case tangentiality is generic. Finally, in [A2] weusedtheterm<br />

“non degenerate” instead of “tangential”.<br />

Definition 6.24. Assume that f ∈ End(M,E) is tangential. We shall say that p ∈ E<br />

is a singular point for f if Xf vanishes at p.<br />

By definition, p ∈ E is a singular point for f if and only if<br />

g1(p)=···= gn(p)=0<br />

for any local chart adapted to E; so singular points are generically isolated.<br />

In the tangential case, only singular points are dynamically meaningful. Indeed,<br />

a not too difficult computation (see [A2, AT1, ABT1]) yields the following

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!