23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210 Tien-Cuong Dinh and Nessim Sibony<br />

of generality, assume that �ψi�DSH ≤ 1. This implies that m := 〈μ,ψ0〉 is bounded.<br />

The invariance of μ and the induction hypothesis imply that<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�〈μ,m(ψ1 ◦ f n1 )...(ψr ◦ f nr )〉−<br />

r<br />

∏<br />

i=0<br />

�<br />

�<br />

〈μ,ψi〉 �<br />

�<br />

�<br />

= �〈μ,mψ1(ψ2 ◦ f n2−n1 )...(ψr ◦ f nr−n1 )〉−m<br />

r<br />

∏<br />

i=1<br />

�<br />

�<br />

〈μ,ψi〉 � ≤ cd −n<br />

for some constant c > 0. In order to get the desired estimate, it is enough to show that<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�〈μ,(ψ0 − m)(ψ1 ◦ f n1 )...(ψr ◦ f nr<br />

�<br />

�<br />

)〉 � ≤ cd −n .<br />

Observe that the operator ( f n ) ∗ acts on Lp (μ) for p ≥ 1 and its norm is bounded by<br />

1. Using the invariance of μ and Hölder’s inequality, we get for p := r + 1<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�〈μ,(ψ0 − m)(ψ1 ◦ f n1 )...(ψr ◦ f nr<br />

�<br />

�<br />

)〉 �<br />

�<br />

�<br />

= �〈μ,Λ n1 (ψ0 − m)ψ1 ...(ψr ◦ f nr−n1<br />

�<br />

�<br />

)〉 �<br />

≤�Λ n1 (ψ0 − m)� L p (μ)�ψ1� L p (μ) ...�ψr ◦ f nr−n1 �L p (μ)<br />

≤ cd −n1 �ψ1� L p (μ) ...�ψr� L p (μ),<br />

for some constant c > 0. Since �ψi� L p (μ) � �ψi�DSH, the previous estimates imply<br />

the result. Note that as in Theorem 1.83, it is enough to assume that ψi is d.s.h. for<br />

i ≤ r − 1andψr is in L p (μ) for some p > 1. ⊓⊔<br />

The mixing of μ implies that for any measurable observable ϕ, the times series<br />

ϕ ◦ f n , behaves like independent random variables with the same distribution.<br />

For example, the dependence of ϕ ◦ f n and ϕ is weak when n is large: if a,b are<br />

real numbers, then the measure of {ϕ ◦ f n ≤ a and ϕ ≤ b} is almost equal to<br />

μ{ϕ ◦ f n ≤ a}μ{ϕ ≤ b}. Indeed, it is equal to<br />

� μ,(1]−∞,a] ◦ ϕ ◦ f n )(1 ]−∞,b] ◦ ϕ) � ,<br />

and when n is large, mixing implies that the last integral is approximatively equal to<br />

〈μ,1 ]−∞,a] ◦ ϕ〉〈μ,1 ]−∞,b] ◦ ϕ〉 = μ{ϕ ≤ a}μ{ϕ ≤ b} = μ{ϕ ◦ f n ≤ a}μ{ϕ ≤ b}.<br />

The estimates on the decay of correlations obtained in the above results, give at<br />

which speed the observables become “almost independent”. We are going to show<br />

that under weak assumptions on the regularity of observables ϕ, the times series<br />

ϕ ◦ f n , satisfies the Central Limit Theorem (CLT for short). We recall the classical<br />

CLT for independent random variables. In what follows, E(·) denotes expectation,<br />

i.e. the mean, of a random variable.<br />

Theorem 1.85. Let (X,F ,ν) be a probability space. Let Z1,Z2,... be independent<br />

identically distributed (i.i.d. for short) random variables with values in R, and of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!