23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

276 Tien-Cuong Dinh and Nessim Sibony<br />

Theorem A.22. Let F be a family of p.s.h. functions on X which is bounded in<br />

L1 loc (X). Let K be a compact subset of X. Then there are constants α > 0 and A > 0<br />

such that<br />

�e −αu �L1 (K) ≤ A<br />

for every function u in F .<br />

P.s.h. functions are in general unbounded. However, the last result shows that<br />

such functions are nearly bounded. The above family F is uniformly bounded from<br />

above on K. So, we also have the estimate<br />

�e α|u| � L 1 (K) ≤ A<br />

for u in F and for some (other) constants α,A. More precise estimates can be<br />

obtained in terms of the maximal Lelong number of dd c u in a neighbourhood of K.<br />

Define the Lelong number ν(u,a) of u at a as the Lelong number of dd c u at a.<br />

The following result describes the relation with the singularity of p.s.h. functions<br />

near a pole. We fix here a local coordinate system for X.<br />

Proposition A.23. The Lelong number ν(u,a) is the supremum of the number ν<br />

such that the inequality u(z) ≤ ν log�z − a� holds in a neighbourhood of a.<br />

If S is a positive closed (p, p)-current, the Lelong number ν(S,a) can be computed<br />

as the mass at a of the measure S ∧ (dd c log�z − a�) k−p . This property allows<br />

to prove the following result, due to Demailly [DEM], which is useful in dynamics.<br />

Proposition A.24. Let τ : (C k ,0) → (C k ,0) be a germ of an open holomorphic map<br />

with τ(0) =0. Let d denote the multiplicity of τ at 0. Let S be a positive closed<br />

(p, p)-current on a neighbourhood of 0. Then, the Lelong number of τ∗(S) at 0<br />

satisfies the inequalities<br />

ν(S,0) ≤ ν(τ∗(S),0) ≤ d k−p ν(S,0).<br />

In particular, we have ν(τ∗(S),0)=0 if and only if ν(S,0)=0.<br />

Assume now that X is a compact Kähler manifold and ω is a Kähler form on<br />

X. IfS is a ddc-closed (p, p)-current, we can, using the ddc-lemma, define a linear<br />

form on Hk−p,k−p (X,C) by [α] ↦→ 〈S,α〉. Therefore, the Poincaré duality implies<br />

that S is canonically associated to a class [S] in H p,p (X,C). IfS is real then [S] is<br />

in H p,p (X,R). IfS is positive, its mass 〈S,ω k−p 〉 depends only on the class [S].<br />

So, the mass of positive ddc-closed currents can be computed cohomologically. In<br />

Pk , the mass of ω p<br />

is a probability measure. If H is a subspace of<br />

FS is 1 since ωk FS<br />

codimension p of P k , then the current associated to H is of mass 1 and it belongs to<br />

the class [ω p<br />

FS ].IfY is an analytic set of pure codimension p of Pk , the degree deg(Y)<br />

of Y is by definition the number of points in its intersection with a generic projective<br />

space of dimension p. One can check that the cohomology class of Y is deg(Y)[ω p<br />

FS ].<br />

The volume of Y, obtained using Wirtinger’s theorem A.2, is equal to 1 p! deg(Y ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!