23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dynamics in Several Complex variables 195<br />

Proposition 1.51. Let ν be a strictly positive constant. Let a be a point in P k such<br />

that the Lelong number ν(R,a) of R at a is strictly smaller than ν. Then, there is<br />

a ball B centered at a such that f n admits at least (1 − √ ν)d kn inverse branches<br />

gi : B → Ui where Ui are open sets in P k of diameter ≤ d −n/2 . In particular, if μ ′ is<br />

a limit value of the measures d −kn ( f n ) ∗ (δa) then �μ ′ − μ�≤2 � ν(R,a).<br />

Given a local coordinate system at a, letF denote the family of complex lines<br />

passing through a. For such a line Δ denote by Δr the disc of center a and of<br />

radius r. The family F is parametrized by P k−1 where the probability measure (the<br />

volume form) associated to the Fubini-Study metric is denoted by L .LetBr denote<br />

the ball of center a and of radius r.<br />

Lemma 1.52. Let S be a positive closed (1,1)-current on a neighbourhood of<br />

a. Then for any δ > 0 there is an r > 0 and a family F ′ ⊂ F , such that<br />

L (F ′ ) ≥ 1 − δ and for every Δ in F ′ , the measure S ∧ [Δr] is well-defined<br />

and of mass ≤ ν(S,a)+δ,whereν(S,a) is the Lelong number of S at a.<br />

Proof. Let π : � P k → P k be the blow-up of P k at a and E the exceptional hypersurface.<br />

Then, we can write π ∗ (S)=ν(S,a)[E]+S ′ with S ′ a current having no mass<br />

on E, see Exercise A.39. It is clear that for almost every Δr, the restriction of the<br />

potentials of S to Δr is not identically −∞, so, the measure S ∧ [Δr] is well-defined.<br />

Let �Δr denote the strict transform of Δr by π, i.e. the closure of π −1 (Δr \{a}).<br />

Then, the � Δr define a smooth holomorphic fibration over E. The measure S ∧ [Δr] is<br />

equal to the push-forward of π ∗ (S) ∧ [ �Δr] by π. Observe that π ∗ (S) ∧ [ �Δr] is equal<br />

to S ′ ∧ [ � Δr] plus ν(S,a) times the Dirac mass at � Δr ∩ E. Therefore, we only have to<br />

consider the Δr such that S ′ ∧ [ �Δr] are of mass ≤ δ.<br />

Since S ′ have no mass on E, its mass on π −1 (Br) tends to 0 when r tends to 0.<br />

It follows from Fubini’s theorem that when r is small enough the mass of the slices<br />

S ′ ∧ [ � Δr] is ≤ δ except for a small family of Δ. This proves the lemma. ⊓⊔<br />

Lemma 1.53. Let U be a neighbourhood of Br. Let S be a positive closed (1,1)current<br />

on U. Then, for every δ > 0, there is a family F ′ ⊂ F with L (F ′ ) > 1−δ,<br />

such that for Δ in F ′ , the measure S ∧ [Δr] is well-defined and of mass ≤ A�S�,<br />

where A > 0 is a constant depending on δ but independent of S.<br />

Proof. We can assume that �S� = 1. Let π be as in Lemma 1.52. Then, by continuity<br />

of π ∗ , the mass of π ∗ (S) on π −1 (Br) is bounded by a constant. It is enough to<br />

apply Fubini’s theorem in order to estimate the mass of π ∗ (S) ∧ [ � Δr]. ⊓⊔<br />

Recall the following theorem due to Sibony-Wong [SW].<br />

Theorem 1.54. Let m > 0 be a positive constant. Let F ′ ⊂ F be such that<br />

L (F ′ ) ≥ m and let Σ denote the intersection of the family F ′ with Br. Then<br />

any holomorphic function h on a neighbourhood of Σ can be extended to a holomorphic<br />

function on B λ r where λ > 0 is a constant depending on m but independent<br />

of F ′ and r. Moreover, we have<br />

sup<br />

B λr<br />

|h|≤sup|h|.<br />

Σ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!