23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 Marco Brunella<br />

(thanks to the plurisubharmonic variation of the fiberwise Poincaré metriconUT ),<br />

and being also exhaustive we deduce that UT is Stein. Probably, this can be done also<br />

if the fiberwise Poincaré metric is less regular, say C 0 . But when there are parabolic<br />

fibers such a simple argument cannot work, because ψ is no more exhaustive (one<br />

can try perhaps to use a renormalization argument like the one used in the proof of<br />

Theorem 2.3). However, if all the fibers are parabolic then we shall see later that UT<br />

is a product T × C (if T is small), and hence it is Stein.<br />

A related problem concerns the existence on UT of holomorphic functions which<br />

are not constant on the fibers. By Corollary 6.5, KF is pseudoeffective, if F is hyperbolic.<br />

Let us assume a little more, namely that it is effective. Then any nontrivial<br />

section of KF over X can be lifted to UT , giving a holomorphic section of the relative<br />

canonical bundle of the fibration. As in Lemmata 2.5 and 2.6, this section can<br />

be integrated along the (simply connected and pointed) fibers, giving a holomorphic<br />

function on UT not constant on generic fibers.<br />

7 Extension of Meromorphic Maps from Line Bundles<br />

In order to generalize Corollary 6.5 to cover (most) parabolic foliations, we need<br />

an extension theorem for certain meromorphic maps. This is done in the present<br />

Section, following [Br5].<br />

7.1 Volume Estimates<br />

Let us firstly recall some results of Dingoyan [Din], in a slightly simplified form due<br />

to our future use.<br />

Let V be a connected complex manifold, of dimension n, andletω be a smooth<br />

closed semipositive (1,1)-form on V (e.g., the pull-back of a Kähler form by some<br />

holomorphic map from V). Let U ⊂ V be an open subset, with boundary ∂U com-<br />

pact in V . Suppose that the mass of ω n on U is finite: �<br />

U ωn < +∞. We look for<br />

some condition ensuring that also the mass on V is finite: �<br />

V ωn < +∞. Inother<br />

words, we look for the boundedness of the ω n -volume of the ends V \U.<br />

Set<br />

Pω(V,U)={ϕ : V → [−∞,+∞) u.s.c. | dd c ϕ + ω ≥ 0, ϕ|U ≤ 0}<br />

where u.s.c. means upper semicontinuous, and the first inequality is in the sense of<br />

currents. This first inequality defines the so-called ω-plurisubharmonic functions.<br />

Note that locally the space of ω-plurisubharmonic functions can be identified with<br />

a translation of the space of the usual plurisubharmonic functions: locally the form<br />

ω admits a smooth potential φ (ω = dd c φ), and so ϕ is ω-plurisubharmonic<br />

is and only if ϕ + φ is plurisubharmonic. In this way, most local problems<br />

on ω-plurisubharmonic functions can be reduced to more familiar problems on<br />

plurisubharmonic functions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!