23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Discrete</strong> <strong>Holomorphic</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Dynamical</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> 15<br />

So setting ϕ = ˜ϕ ◦ ψ, we have defined a function ϕ with the required properties<br />

on P + j . To extend it to the whole basin B it suffices to put<br />

ϕ(z)=ϕ � f k (z) � − k, (13)<br />

where k ∈ N is the first integer such that f k (z) ∈ P + j . ⊓⊔<br />

A way to construct the conjugation ϕ as limit of hyperbolic linearizations given<br />

by Theorem 2.4 is described in [U3].<br />

Remark 3.7. It is possible to construct petals that cannot be contained in any sector<br />

strictly smaller than Σ j. TodosoweneedanF-invariant subset ˆHε of C∗ \ R− containing ˜Hε and containing eventually every half-line issuing from the origin<br />

(but R− ). For M >> 1andC > 0 large enough, replace the straight lines bounding<br />

˜Hε on the left of Rew = −M by the curves<br />

�<br />

C log|Rew| if r = 1 ,<br />

|Imw| =<br />

C|Rew| 1−1/r if r > 1.<br />

Then it is not too difficult to check that the domain ˆHε so obtained is as desired (see<br />

[CG]).<br />

So we have a complete description of the dynamics in the neighbourhood of<br />

the origin. Actually, Camacho has pushed this argument even further, obtaining a<br />

complete topological classification of one-dimensional holomorphic local dynamical<br />

systems tangent to the identity (see also [BH, Theorem 1.7]):<br />

Theorem 3.8 (Camacho, 1978 [C]; Shcherbakov, 1982 [S]). Let f ∈ End(C,0) be<br />

a holomorphic local dynamical system tangent to the identity with multiplicity r + 1<br />

at the fixed point. Then f is topologically locally conjugated to the map<br />

g(z)=z − z r+1 .<br />

Remark 3.9. Camacho’s proof ([C]; see also [Br2, J1]) shows that the topological<br />

conjugation can be taken smooth in a punctured neighbourhood of the origin.<br />

Jenkins [J1] also proved that if f ∈ End(C,0) is tangent to the identity with<br />

multiplicity 2 and the topological conjugation is actually real-analitic in a punctured<br />

neighbourhood of the origin, with real-analytic inverse, then f is locally holomorphically<br />

conjugated to z−z 2 . Finally, Martinet and Ramis [MR]haveprovedthatifa<br />

germ f ∈ End(C,0) tangent to the identity is C 1 -conjugated (in a full neighbourhood<br />

of the origin) to g(z)=z?z r+1 , then the conjugation can be chosen holomorphic or<br />

antiholomorphic.<br />

The formal classification is simple too, though different (see, e.g., Milnor [Mi]):<br />

Proposition 3.10. Let f ∈ End(C,0) be a holomorphic local dynamical system tangent<br />

to the identity with multiplicity r + 1 at the fixed point. Then f is formally<br />

conjugated to the map<br />

g(z)=z − z r+1 + β z 2r+1 , (14)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!