23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Uniformisation of Foliations by Curves 145<br />

is not a rational quasi-fibration, and all the local weights F introduced above are<br />

plurisubharmonic, and not identically −∞.<br />

Let us state two evident but important Corollaries.<br />

Corollary 6.5. The canonical bundle KF of a hyperbolic foliation F is pseudoeffective.<br />

Corollary 6.6. Given a hyperbolic foliation F , the subset<br />

is complete pluripolar in X.<br />

Sing(F ) ∪ Parab(F )<br />

We think that the conclusion of this last Corollary could be strengthened. The<br />

most optimistic conjecture is that Sing(F )∪Parab(F ) is even an analytic subset of<br />

X. At the moment, however, we are very far from proving such a fact (except when<br />

dimX = 2, where special techniques are available, see [MQ1] and[Br1]). Even<br />

the closedness of Sing(F ) ∪ Parab(F ) seems an open problem! This is related to<br />

the more general problem of the continuity of the leafwise Poincaré metric(which<br />

would give, in particular, the closedness of its polar set). Let us prove a partial result<br />

in this direction, following a rather standard hyperbolic argument [Ghy,Br2]. Recall<br />

that a complex compact analytic space Z is hyperbolic if every holomorphic map of<br />

C into Z is constant [Lan].<br />

Theorem 6.7. Let F be a foliation by curves on a compact connected Kähler manifold<br />

M. Suppose that:<br />

(i) every leaf is hyperbolic;<br />

(ii) Sing(F ) is hyperbolic.<br />

Then the leafwise Poincaré metric is continuous.<br />

Proof. Let us consider the function<br />

F : U 0 → R, F(q)=log�v(q)�Poin<br />

introduced just before Proposition 6.2. WehavetoprovethatF is continuous (the<br />

continuity on the full U is then a consequence of Proposition 6.3). We have already<br />

observed, during the proof of Proposition 6.2,thatF is upper semicontinuous, hence<br />

let us consider its lower semicontinuity.<br />

Take q∞ ∈ U 0 and take a sequence {qn}⊂U 0 converging to q∞. Foreveryn, let<br />

ϕn : D → X be a holomorphic map into Lqn ⊂ X, sending 0 ∈ D to qn ∈ Lqn .For<br />

every compact subset K ⊂ D, consider<br />

IK = {�ϕ ′ n (t)� |t ∈ K,n ∈ N}⊂R<br />

(the norm of ϕ ′ n is here computed with the Kähler metric on X).<br />

Claim: IK is a bounded subset of R.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!