23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dynamics in Several Complex variables 285<br />

Let Ck−p+1(Pk ) denote the convex set of positive closed currents of bidegree<br />

(k − p +1,k − p +1) and of mass 1, i.e. currents cohomologous to ω k−p+1<br />

.LetSbe FS<br />

a positive closed (p, p)-current on Pk . We assume for simplicity that S is of mass 1;<br />

the general case can be deduced by linearity. The super-potential12 US of S is a function<br />

on Ck−p+1(Pk ) with values in R ∪{−∞}.LetRbe a current in Ck−p+1(Pk ) and<br />

UR a potential of R − ω k−p+1<br />

FS . Subtracting from UR a constant times ω k−p<br />

FS allows to<br />

have 〈UR,ω p<br />

FS 〉 = 0. We say that UR is a quasi-potential of mean 0 of R. Formally,<br />

i.e. in the case where R and UR are smooth, the value of US at R is defined by<br />

US(R) := 〈S,UR〉.<br />

One easily check using Stokes’ formula that formally if US is a quasi-potential<br />

of mean 0 of S, thenUS(R)=〈US,R〉. Therefore, the previous definition does not<br />

depend on the choice of UR or US. By definition, we have US(ω k−p+1<br />

FS )=0. Observe<br />

also that when S is smooth, the above definition makes sense for every R and US is<br />

a continuous affine function on Ck−p+1(Pk ). It is also clear that if US = US ′,then<br />

S = S ′ . The following theorem allows to define US in the general case.<br />

Theorem A.45. The above function US, which is defined on smooth forms R in<br />

Ck−p+1(P k ), can be extended to an affine function on Ck−p+1(P k ) with values in<br />

R ∪{−∞} by<br />

US(R) := limsupUS(R ′ ),<br />

where R ′ is smooth in Ck−p+1(P k ) and converges to R. We have US(R) =UR(S).<br />

Moreover, there are smooth positive closed (p, p)-forms Sn of mass 1 and constants<br />

cn converging to 0 such that USn + cn decrease to US. In particular, USn converge<br />

pointwise to US.<br />

For bidegree (1,1), there is a unique quasi-p.s.h. function uS such that dd c uS =<br />

S − ωFS and 〈ω k FS ,uS〉 = 0. If δa denotes the Dirac mass at a, wehaveUS(δa) =<br />

uS(a). Dirac masses are extremal elements in Ck(P k ). The super-potential US in this<br />

case is just the affine extension of uS, that is, we have for any probability measure ν:<br />

�<br />

US(ν)=<br />

�<br />

US(δa)dν(a)=<br />

uS(a)dν(a).<br />

The function US extends the action 〈S,Φ〉 on smooth forms Φ to 〈S,U〉 where<br />

U is a quasi-potential of a positive closed current. Super-potentials satisfy analogous<br />

properties as quasi-p.s.h. functions do. They are upper semi-continuous and<br />

bounded from above by a universal constant. Note that we consider here the weak<br />

topology on Ck−p+1(P k ). We have the following version of the Hartogs’ lemma.<br />

Proposition A.46. Let Sn be positive closed (p, p)-currents of mass 1 on Pk converging<br />

to S. Then for every continuous function U on Ck−p+1 with US < U ,we<br />

have USn < U for n large enough. In particular, limsupUSn ≤ US.<br />

12 The super-potential we consider here corresponds to the super-potential of mean 0 in [DS10].<br />

The other super-potentials differ from US by constants.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!