23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dynamics in Several Complex variables 213<br />

Then, ψ satisfies the Gordin’s condition, see Theorem 1.86, if and only if the<br />

sum ∑n≥1 n�ψn� 2<br />

L 2 (μ) is finite. Moreover, if ψ is d.s.h. (resp. of class C ν , 0 < ν ≤ 2)<br />

with 〈μ,ψ〉 = 0,then�ψn� L 2 (μ) � d −n (resp. �ψn� L 2 (μ) � d −nν/2 ).<br />

Proof. It is easy to check that V ⊥ n = {θ ◦ f n , θ ∈ L2 (μ)}. LetWn+1denote the<br />

orthogonal complement of Vn in Vn+1. Suppose θ ◦ f n is in Wn+1. Then, Λ(θ)=0.<br />

This gives the first decomposition in the proposition.<br />

For the second decomposition, observe that ⊕∞ n=0V1 ◦ f n is a direct orthogonal<br />

sum. We only have to show that ∪Vn is dense in L2 0 (μ).Letθbe an element in ∩V ⊥ n .<br />

We have to show that θ = 0. For every n, θ = θn ◦ f n for appropriate θn. Hence, θ is<br />

measurable with respect to the σ-algebra B∞ := ∩n≥0Bn. We show that B∞ is the<br />

trivial algebra. Let A be an element of B∞. DefineAn = f n (A). SinceAis in B∞,<br />

1A = 1An ◦ f n and Λ n (1A)=1An . K-mixing implies that Λ n (1A) converges in L2 (μ)<br />

to a constant, see Theorem 1.82.So,1Anconverges to a constant which is necessarily<br />

0 or 1. We deduce that μ(An) converges to 0 or 1. On the other hand, we have<br />

μ(An)=〈μ,1An 〉 = 〈μ,1An ◦ f n 〉 = 〈μ,1A〉 = μ(A).<br />

Therefore, A is of measure 0 or 1. This implies the decomposition of L2 0 (μ).<br />

Suppose now that ψ := ∑ψn ◦ f n with Λ(ψn)=0, is an element of L2 0 (μ). We<br />

have E(ψ|Bn)=∑i≥n ψi ◦ f i .So,<br />

∑ �E(ψ|Bn)�<br />

n≥0<br />

2<br />

L2 (μ) = ∑ (n + 1)�ψn�<br />

n≥0<br />

2<br />

L2 (μ) ,<br />

and ψ satisfies Gordin’s condition if and only if the last sum is finite.<br />

Let ψ be a d.s.h. function with 〈μ,ψ〉 = 0. It follows from Theorem 1.83 that<br />

�E(ψ|Bn)�L 2 (μ) = sup<br />

�ϕ�<br />

L2 ≤1<br />

(μ)<br />

|〈μ,(ϕ ◦ f n )ψ〉| � d −n .<br />

Since ψn ◦ f n = E(ψ|Bn) − E(ψ|Bn+1), the above estimate implies that<br />

�ψn� L 2 (μ) = �ψn ◦ f n � L 2 (μ) � d −n .<br />

The case of C ν observables is proved in the same way.<br />

Observe that if (ψn ◦ f n )n≥0 is the sequence of projections of ψ on the factors of<br />

the direct sum ⊕ ∞ n=0 V1 ◦ f n , then the coordinates of Λ(ψ) are (ψn ◦ f n−1 )n≥1. ⊓⊔<br />

We continue the study with other types of convergence. Let us recall the almost<br />

sure version of the central limit theorem in probability theory. Let Zn be random<br />

variables, identically distributed in L 2 (X,F ,ν), such that E(Zn) =0and<br />

E(Z 2 n)=σ 2 , σ > 0. We say that the almost sure central limit theorem holds if at<br />

ν-almost every point in X, the sequence of measures<br />

1<br />

logN<br />

N<br />

∑<br />

n=1<br />

1<br />

n δ n −1/2 ∑ n−1<br />

i=0 Zi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!