23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

192 Tien-Cuong Dinh and Nessim Sibony<br />

dimension < dimX, such that g −s (E) ⊂ Eforsomes≥ 1, thenE⊂ EX . Moreover,<br />

there are at most finitely many analytic sets in X which are totally invariant under g.<br />

Since g permutes the irreducible components of X, we can find an integer m ≥ 1<br />

such that g m fixes the components of X.<br />

Lemma 1.48. The topological degree of g m is equal to d mp .Moreprecisely,thereis<br />

a hypersurface Y of X containing sing(X) ∪ g m (sing(X)) such that for x ∈ X out of<br />

Y, the fiber g −m (x) has exactly d mp points.<br />

Proof. Since g m fixes the components of X, we can assume that X is irreducible. It<br />

follows that g m defines a covering over some Zariski dense open set of X. Wewant<br />

to prove that δ, the degree of this covering, is equal to d mp . Consider the positive<br />

measure ( f m ) ∗ (ω p<br />

FS ) ∧ [X]. Since( f m ) ∗ (ω p<br />

FS ) is cohomologous to dmpω p<br />

FS ,this<br />

measure is of mass d mp deg(X). Observe that ( f m )∗ preserves the mass of positive<br />

measures and that we have ( f m )∗[X]=δ[X]. Hence,<br />

d mp deg(X) =�( f m ) ∗ (ω p<br />

FS ) ∧ [X]� = �( f m )∗(( f m ) ∗ (ω p<br />

FS ) ∧ [X])�<br />

= �ω p<br />

FS ∧ ( f m )∗[X]� = δ�ω p<br />

FS<br />

∧ [X]� = δ deg(X).<br />

It follows that δ = d mp . So, we can take for Y, a hypersurface which contains the<br />

ramification values of g m and the set sing(X) ∪ g m (sing(X)). ⊓⊔<br />

Let Y be as above. Observe that if g m (x) �∈Y then g m defines a bi-holomorphic<br />

map between a neighbourhood of x and a neighbourhood of g m (x) in X. Let[Y ]<br />

denote the (k − p + 1,k − p + 1)-current of integration on Y in P k .Since( f mn )∗[Y ]<br />

is a positive closed (k − p + 1,k − p + 1)-current of mass d mn(p−1) deg(Y ), we can<br />

define the following ramification current<br />

R = ∑ Rn := ∑ d<br />

n≥0 n≥0<br />

−mnp ( f mn )∗[Y].<br />

Let ν(R,x) denote the Lelong number of R at x. By Theorem A.14, forc > 0,<br />

Ec := {ν(R,x) ≥ c} is an analytic set of dimension ≤ p −1 contained in X.Observe<br />

that E1 contains Y. WewillseethatRmeasures the obstruction for constructing<br />

good backwards orbits.<br />

For any point x ∈ X let λ ′ n (x) denote the number of distinct orbits<br />

x−n,x−n+1,...,x−1,x0<br />

such that gm (x−i−1)=x−i, x0 = x and x−i ∈ X \Y for 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1. These are the<br />

“good” orbits. Define λn := d−mpnλ ′ n . The function λn is lower semi-continuous with<br />

respect to the Zariski topology on X. Moreover, by Lemma 1.48,wehave0≤λn≤1 and λn = 1 out of the analytic set ∪n−1 i=0 gmi (Y ). The sequence (λn) decreases to a<br />

function λ , which represents the asymptotic proportion of backwards orbits in X \Y.<br />

Lemma 1.49. There is a constant γ > 0 such that λ ≥ γ on X \ E1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!