23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

212 Tien-Cuong Dinh and Nessim Sibony<br />

A straighforward computation using the invariance of ν gives that the variance<br />

σ in the above theorem is equal to<br />

σ = lim<br />

n→∞ n −1/2 �ϕ + ···+ ϕ ◦ g n−1 � L 2 (ν) .<br />

When ϕ is orthogonal to all ϕ ◦g n ,wefindthatσ = �ϕ� L 2 (μ) . So, Gordin’s theorem<br />

assumes a weak dependence and concludes that the observables satisfy the central<br />

limit theorem.<br />

Consider now the dynamical system associated to an endomorphism f of P k as<br />

above. Let B denote the Borel σ-algebra on P k and define Bn := f −n (B). Since<br />

the measure μ satisfies f ∗ (μ) =d k μ, the norms �E(·|Bn)� L 2 (μ) can be expressed<br />

in terms of the operator Λ. We have the following lemma.<br />

Lemma 1.87. Let ϕ be an observable in L 2 (μ). Then<br />

for 1 ≤ p ≤ 2.<br />

E(ϕ|Fn)=Λ n (ϕ) ◦ f n<br />

and �E(ϕ|Bn)� L p (μ) = �Λ n (ϕ)� L p (μ),<br />

Proof. We have<br />

� μ,ϕ(ψ ◦ f n ) � = � d −kn ( f n ) ∗ (μ),ϕ(ψ ◦ f n ) � = � μ,d −kn ( f n )∗[ϕ(ψ ◦ f n )] �<br />

= � μ,Λ n (ϕ)ψ � = � μ,[Λ n (ϕ) ◦ f n ][ψ ◦ f n ] � .<br />

This proves the first assertion. The invariance of μ implies that �ψ ◦ f n � L p (μ) =<br />

�ψ� L p (μ). Therefore, the second assertion is a consequence of the first one. ⊓⊔<br />

Gordin’s Theorem 1.86, Corollaries 1.41 and 1.42, applied to q = 2, give the<br />

following result.<br />

Corollary 1.88. Let f be an endomorphism of algebraic degree d ≥ 2 of P k and μ<br />

its equilibrium measure. Let ϕ be a d.s.h. function or a Hölder continuous function<br />

on P k , such that 〈μ,ϕ〉 = 0. Assume that ϕ is not a coboundary. Then ϕ satisfies<br />

the central limit theorem with the variance σ > 0 given by<br />

σ 2 := 〈μ,ϕ 2 〉 + 2 ∑ 〈μ,ϕ(ϕ ◦ f<br />

n≥1<br />

n )〉.<br />

We give an interesting decomposition of the space L2 0 (μ) which shows that Λ,<br />

acts like a “generalized shift”. Recall that L2 0 (μ) is the space of functions ψ ∈ L2 (μ)<br />

such that 〈μ,ψ〉 = 0. Corollary 1.88 can also be deduced from the following result.<br />

Proposition 1.89. Let f be an endomorphism of algebraic degree d ≥ 2 of P k and<br />

μ the corresponding equilibrium measure. Define<br />

Vn := {ψ ∈ L 2 0 (μ), Λ n (ψ)=0}.<br />

Then, we have Vn+1 = Vn ⊕V1 ◦ f n as an orthogonal sum and L 2 0 (μ)=⊕∞ n=0 V1 ◦ f n<br />

as a Hilbert sum. Let ψ = ∑ψn ◦ f n , with ψn ∈ V1, be a function in L 2 0 (μ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!