23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

268 Tien-Cuong Dinh and Nessim Sibony<br />

center a and of radius r, then the ratio between the volume of Y ∩Br and the volume<br />

of a ball of radius r in C p decreases to mult(Y,a) when r decreases to 0.<br />

Let τ : X1 → X2 be an open holomorphic map between complex manifolds of the<br />

same dimension. Applying the above result to the graph of τ, we can show that for<br />

any point a ∈ X1 and for a neighbourhoodU of a small enough, if z is a generic point<br />

in X2 close enough to τ(a), the number of points in τ −1 (z)∩U does not depend on z.<br />

We call this number the multiplicity or the local topological degree of τ at a.Wesay<br />

that τ is a ramified covering of degree d if τ is open, proper and each fiber of τ contains<br />

exactly d points counted with multiplicity. In this case, if Σ2 is the set of critical<br />

values of τ and Σ1 := τ −1 (Σ2),thenτ : X1 \ Σ1 → X2 \ Σ2 is a covering of degree d.<br />

We recall the notion of analytic space which generalizes complex manifolds and<br />

their analytic subsets. An analytic space of dimension ≤ p is defined as a complex<br />

manifold but a chart is replaced with an analytic subset of dimension ≤ p in an<br />

open set of a complex Euclidean space. As in the case of analytic subsets, one can<br />

decompose analytic spaces into irreducible components and into regular and singular<br />

parts. The notions of dimension, of Zariski topology and of holomorphic maps<br />

can be extended to analytic spaces. The precise definition uses the local ring of<br />

holomorphic functions, see [GU,N]. An analytic space is normal if the local ring of<br />

holomorphic functions at every point is integrally closed. This is equivalent to the<br />

fact that for U open in Z holomorphic functions on reg(Z) ∩U which are bounded<br />

near sing(Z) ∩U, are holomorphic on U. In particular, normal analytic spaces are<br />

locally irreducible. A holomorphic map f : Z1 → Z2 between complex spaces is a<br />

continuous map which induces morphisms from local rings of holomorphic functions<br />

on Z2 to the ones on Z1. The notions of ramified covering, of multiplicity and<br />

of open maps can be extended to normal analytic spaces. We have the following<br />

useful result where �Z is called normalization of Z.<br />

Theorem A.4. Let Z be an analytic space. Then there is a unique, up to a biholomorphic<br />

map, normal analytic space �Z and a finite holomorphic map π : �Z → Z<br />

such that<br />

1. π −1 (reg(Z)) is a dense Zariski open set of �Z and π defines a bi-holomorphic<br />

map between π −1 (reg(Z)) and reg(Z);<br />

2. If τ : Z ′ → Z is a holomorphic map between analytic spaces, then there is a<br />

unique holomorphic map h : Z ′ → �Z satisfying π ◦ h = τ.<br />

In particular, holomorphic self-maps of Z can be lifted to holomorphic self-maps<br />

of �Z.<br />

Example A.5. Let π : C → C2 be the holomorphic map given by π(t)=(t2 ,t 3 ).This<br />

map defines a normalization of the analytic curve {z3 1 = z22 } in C2 which is singular<br />

at 0. The normalization of the analytic set {z1 = 0}∪{z3 1 = z22 } is the union of two<br />

disjoint complex lines. The normalization of a complex curve (an analytic set of<br />

pure dimension 1) is always smooth.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!