23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dynamics in Several Complex variables 187<br />

Proposition 1.37. The operator Λ : W ∗ (P k ) → W ∗ (P k ) is well-defined, bounded<br />

and continuous with respect to the weak topology on W ∗ (P k ). The operator<br />

�Λ : W ∗ (P k ) → W ∗ (P k ) defined by<br />

is contracting and satisfies the estimate<br />

�Λ(ϕ) := Λ(ϕ) −〈ω k FS ,Λ(ϕ)〉<br />

� �Λ(ϕ)�W ∗ ≤ d−1/2 �ϕ�W ∗.<br />

Sketch of proof. As in Proposition 1.34,sinceϕis in L1 (Pk ), Λ(ϕ) is also in L1 (Pk )<br />

and the main point here is to estimate ∂ϕ.LetSbe a positive closed (1,1)-current<br />

on Pk such that √ −1∂ϕ∧ ∂ϕ ≤ S. We show that √ −1∂ f∗(ϕ) ∧ ∂ f∗(ϕ) ≤ dk f∗(S),<br />

in particular, the Poincaré differential dΛ(ϕ) of Λ(ϕ) is in L2 (Pk ).<br />

If a is not a critical value of f and U a small neighbourhood of a,thenf−1 (U) is<br />

the union of dk open sets Ui which are sent bi-holomorphically on U.Letgi : U → Ui<br />

be the inverse branches of f .OnU, we obtain using Schwarz’s inequality that<br />

√<br />

−1∂ f∗(ϕ) ∧ ∂ f∗(ϕ) = √ �<br />

−1<br />

∑∂g ∗ i (ϕ)<br />

�<br />

∧<br />

�<br />

∑∂g ∗ i (ϕ)<br />

≤ d k ∑ √ −1∂g ∗ i (ϕ) ∧ ∂g∗i (ϕ)<br />

= d k �√ �<br />

f∗ −1∂ϕ∧ ∂ϕ .<br />

Therefore, we have √ −1∂ f∗(ϕ) ∧ ∂ f∗(ϕ) ≤ d k f∗(S) out of the critical values of f<br />

which is a manifold of real codimension 2.<br />

Recall that f∗(ϕ) is in L 1 (P k ). It is a classical result in Sobolev spaces theory<br />

that an L 1 function whose gradient out of a submanifold of codimension 2 is<br />

in L 2 , is in fact in the Sobolev space W 1,2 (P k ). We deduce that the inequality<br />

√ −1∂ f∗(ϕ) ∧ ∂ f∗(ϕ) ≤ d k f∗(S) holds on P k , because the left hand side term is an<br />

L 1 form and has no mass on critical values of f . Finally, we have<br />

√ −1∂Λ(ϕ) ∧ ∂Λ(ϕ) ≤ d −k f∗(S).<br />

This, together with the identity � f∗(S)� = dk−1�S�, implies that � �Λ(ϕ)�W ∗ ≤<br />

d−1/2�S�. The proposition follows. �<br />

In the rest of this paragraph, we show that the Green measure μ is moderate,<br />

see Appendix A.4. Recall that a positive measure ν on P k is moderate if there are<br />

constants α > 0andc > 0suchthat<br />

�e −αϕ � L 1 (ν) ≤ c<br />

for ϕ quasi-p.s.h. such that ddcϕ ≥−ωFS and 〈ωk FS ,ϕ〉 = 0. Moderate measures are<br />

PB and by linearity, if ν is moderate and D is a bounded set of d.s.h. functions then<br />

there are constants α > 0andc > 0 such that<br />

�e α|ϕ| � L 1 (ν) ≤ c for ϕ ∈ D.<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!