23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Discrete</strong> <strong>Holomorphic</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Dynamical</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> 35<br />

See also Ruggiero [Ru] for similar results for semi-superattracting (one eigenvalue<br />

zero, one eigenvalue different from zero) germs in C 2 .<br />

Coming back to hyperbolic dynamical systems, the holomorphic and even the<br />

formal classification are not as simple as the topological one. The main problem is<br />

caused by resonances.<br />

Definition 5.9. Let f ∈ End(C n ,O) be a holomorphic local dynamical system, and<br />

let denote by λ1,...,λn ∈ C the eigenvalues of dfO. Aresonance for f is a relation<br />

of the form<br />

λ k1 kn<br />

1 ···λn − λ j = 0 (35)<br />

for some 1 ≤ j ≤ n and some k1,...,kn ∈ N with k1 +···+kn ≥ 2. When n = 1there<br />

is a resonance if and only if the multiplier is a root of unity, or zero; but if n > 1<br />

resonances may occur in the hyperbolic case too.<br />

Resonances are the obstruction to formal linearization. Indeed, a computation completely<br />

analogous to the one yielding Proposition 4.4 shows that the coefficients of a<br />

formal linearization have in the denominators quantities of the form λ k1 kn<br />

1 ···λn −λj;<br />

hence<br />

Proposition 5.10. Let f ∈ End(C n ,O) be a locally invertible holomorphic local dynamical<br />

system with a hyperbolic fixed point and no resonances. Then f is formally<br />

conjugated to its differential d fO.<br />

In presence of resonances, even the formal classification is not that easy. Let us<br />

assume, for simplicity, that dfO is in Jordan form, that is<br />

with ε1,...,εn−1 ∈{0,1}.<br />

P1(z)=(λ1z,ε2z1 + λ2z2,...,εnzn−1 + λnzn),<br />

Definition 5.11. We shall say that a monomial z k1<br />

1 ···zkn<br />

n in the j-th coordinate of f<br />

is resonant if k1 + ···+ kn ≥ 2andλ k1 kn<br />

1 ···λn = λ j.<br />

Then Proposition 5.10 can be generalized to (see [Ar, p. 194] or [IY, p. 53] for a<br />

proof):<br />

Proposition 5.12 (Poincaré, 1893 [Po]; Dulac, 1904 [Du]). Let f ∈ End(C n ,O)<br />

be a locally invertible holomorphic local dynamical system with a hyperbolic fixed<br />

point. Then it is formally conjugated to a g ∈ C0[[z1,...,zn]] n such that dgO is in<br />

Jordan normal form, and g has only resonant monomials.<br />

Definition 5.13. The formal series g is called a Poincaré-Dulac normal form of f .<br />

The problem with Poincaré-Dulac normal forms is that they are not unique. In<br />

particular, one may wonder whether it could be possible to have such a normal<br />

form including finitely many resonant monomials only (as happened, for instance,<br />

in Proposition 3.10).<br />

This is indeed the case (see, e.g., Reich [Re1]) when f belongs to the Poincaré<br />

domain, that is when dfO is invertible and O is either attracting or repelling. As far

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!