23.11.2012 Views

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

Discrete Holomorphic Local Dynamical Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dynamics in Several Complex variables 275<br />

each variable. Let u1,...,un be p.s.h. functions on X. Then χ(u1,...,un) is p.s.h. In<br />

particular, the function max(u1,...,un) is p.s.h.<br />

We call complete pluripolar set the pole set {u = −∞} of a p.s.h. function and<br />

pluripolar set a subset of a complete pluripolar one. Pluripolar sets are of Hausdorff<br />

dimension ≤ 2k − 2, in particular, they have zero Lebesgue measure. Finite and<br />

countable unions of (locally) pluripolar sets are (locally) pluripolar. In particular,<br />

finite and countable unions of analytic subsets are locally pluripolar.<br />

Proposition A.19. Let E be a closed pluripolar set in X and u a p.s.h. function on<br />

X \ E, locally bounded above near E. Then the extension of u to X given by<br />

is a p.s.h. function.<br />

u(z) := limsupu(w)<br />

w→z<br />

w∈X\E<br />

for z ∈ E,<br />

The following result describes compactness properties of p.s.h. functions, see<br />

[HO].<br />

Proposition A.20. Let (un) be a sequence of p.s.h. functions on X, locally bounded<br />

from above. Then either it converges locally uniformly to −∞ on a component of<br />

X or there is a subsequence (uni ) which converges in Lp<br />

loc (X) to a p.s.h. function<br />

u for every p with 1 ≤ p < ∞. In the second case, we have limsupuni ≤ u with<br />

equality outside a pluripolar set. Moreover, if K is a compact subset of X and if h is a<br />

continuous function on K such that u < honK,thenuni < h on K for i large enough.<br />

The last assertion is the classical Hartogs’ lemma. It suggests the following notion<br />

of convergence introduced in [DS10]. Let (un) be a sequence of p.s.h. functions<br />

converging to a p.s.h. function u in L 1 loc (X). We say that the sequence (un) converges<br />

in the Hartogs’ sense or is H-convergent if for any compact subset K of X there<br />

are constants cn converging to 0 such that un + cn ≥ u on K. In this case, Hartogs’<br />

lemma implies that un converge pointwise to u. If(un) decreases to a function u,<br />

not identically −∞, thenu is p.s.h. and (un) converges in the Hartogs’ sense. The<br />

following result is useful in the calculus with p.s.h. functions.<br />

Proposition A.21. Let u be a p.s.h. function on an open subset D of C k .LetD ′ ⋐ D<br />

be an open set. Then, there is a sequence of smooth p.s.h. functions un on D ′ which<br />

decreases to u.<br />

The functions un can be obtained as the standard convolution of u with some<br />

radial function ρn on C k . The submean inequality for u allows to choose ρn so that<br />

un decrease to u.<br />

The following result, see [HO2], may be considered as the strongest compactness<br />

property for p.s.h. functions. The proof can be reduced to the one dimensional case<br />

by slicing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!