11.07.2015 Views

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

268 INFLUENCE OF SCRIPTURES.happy, notwithstanding <strong>the</strong>ir admitted sinfulness, by virtue <strong>of</strong> a bigotedconfidence in <strong>the</strong> pre-eminent ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir parents, <strong>the</strong>ir priests, or<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves to learn tenets <strong>of</strong>which <strong>the</strong> great majority <strong>of</strong> mankind areignorant? Humility in pr<strong>of</strong>ession is associated with a towering and overbearingpresumption in practice toward all who differ with <strong>the</strong>m in creed:hence an effort to instruct o<strong>the</strong>rs at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> millions spent in missions,while <strong>the</strong>y have no better evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ownknowledge than a fallible human conviction.1372. If two persons, A. and ]5., were organized exactly alike, educatedprecisely in <strong>the</strong> same w^ay, and subjected to <strong>the</strong> same temptations or incentives,would <strong>the</strong>y not act alike ? Would not <strong>the</strong>ir acting differently provethat <strong>the</strong>y were not alike in all respects ?1373. It may bo said that <strong>the</strong>y are free agents, being endowed with freewill;but if <strong>the</strong>y be perfectly alike and similarly situated, (agreeably to <strong>the</strong>premises,) <strong>the</strong>ir free-will must be perfectly similar ; and if not, let it beallowed to be, through God's will, perfectly similar. Is it in <strong>the</strong>ir powerto alter <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir will,any more than ^' <strong>the</strong> colour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir hair."1374. If any o<strong>the</strong>r being act differently from <strong>the</strong>se, does it not followthat he is differently organized, educated, or situated from <strong>the</strong>m ; and that<strong>the</strong> diversity in one or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se respects must be proportionable todegree in which his actions and morals differ from those <strong>of</strong> A. and B.1375. But it may be inquired, where is <strong>the</strong> merit <strong>of</strong> virtue, or <strong>the</strong> demerit<strong>of</strong> vice, if <strong>the</strong>y be <strong>the</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> causes over which we haveno control ? The reply is, that virtue is an endowment due to <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong>Deity, just as <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> different races <strong>of</strong> mankind and<strong>the</strong> various genera <strong>of</strong> animals, or between individuals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same species,must be due to that volition. An analogous idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> God'shelp to virtue is<strong>the</strong>insisted upon by some <strong>of</strong> our most respectable and numerousChristian sects. It places virtue in man, so far as it may exist, upon<strong>the</strong> same basis as in God. It has always been held by all Christians thatGod can do no wrong; that vice is inconsistent with his nature. Themore, <strong>the</strong>n, a man isby nature and education incapable <strong>of</strong> being vicious,<strong>the</strong> greater his natural aptitude for virtue, <strong>the</strong> more he approaches its mostperfect exemplification.137G. But how can <strong>the</strong> punishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wicked be justified underthis view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir case? I answer, that it can only be justified in selfdefence,for <strong>the</strong> reformation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fender, or to prevent <strong>the</strong> repetition<strong>of</strong> injury where no o<strong>the</strong>r means can be employed, just as killing wildbeasts, noxious insects, or our enemies in warfare is justified.1377. Punishment, unless with a view to prevention or reformation,seems to me diabolic.It seems irreconcilable with <strong>the</strong> injunction to returngood for evil, that <strong>the</strong> Deity from whom it proceeds should return evil forevil, in excess; that he should, for finite and transient sins, award eternalpunishment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!