11.07.2015 Views

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OF MATTER, MIND, AND SPIRIT.3G9which must perpetuate liis fauic ? (See Appendix for FurraJay's Speculationson Electric Conduction and <strong>the</strong> Nature <strong>of</strong> Matter.)On WhewclVs demonstration that all matter is Jieav?/.1793. "While <strong>the</strong> speculations <strong>of</strong> Farraday, isolate gravitation, as <strong>the</strong>only matter endowed with weight, and treat all o<strong>the</strong>r matters as weightless,those <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r eminent philosopher, Whewell, would tend to provethat all matter is heavy.1794. This subject may be interesting now, when we are anxious to understandwell <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> matter, which Comte would represent as <strong>the</strong>basis <strong>of</strong> mind, and when it becomes a point <strong>of</strong> departure in forming ideas<strong>of</strong> <strong>spirit</strong> and mind, as <strong>the</strong>y must be contemplated by Spiritualism. I<strong>the</strong>refore subjoin a critique upon <strong>the</strong> allegation that all matter can beheavy, and on <strong>the</strong> relation between vis incrtice and gravitation.1795. One consideration seems to be usually overlooked in contemplating<strong>the</strong>se forces. It is forgotten that inertia is <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> onebody, while gravitation requires two for its existence. If <strong>the</strong>re were onlyone body in nature, it might move on, in obedience to its vis inertia:, forany length <strong>of</strong> time ;but, during an isolated existence, could nei<strong>the</strong>r attractnor be attracted. Whewell's <strong>the</strong>orem, in his own language, is as follows1796. ^' We see," alleges Whewell, ^^ that <strong>the</strong> propositions that all bodiesare heavy, and that inertia is proportional to weight, necessarily followfrom those fundamental ideas which we unavoidably employ in all attemptsto reason concerning <strong>the</strong> mechanical relations <strong>of</strong> bodies." (See Demonstrationthat all Matter is heavy, by <strong>the</strong> Rev. William Whewell, B.D. Silliman'sJournal, vol. 42, page 265.)To Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Whewell :1797. Dear Sir : I thank you for your kind attention m sending mea copy <strong>of</strong> your pamplilet, entitled a ^^Demonstration that all Hatter islieavy^^ comprising a communication made to <strong>the</strong> Cambridge PhilosophicalSociety.1798. I conceive that to demonstrate that all matter is heavy, is, ino<strong>the</strong>r words, to prove that all matter is endowed with attraction <strong>of</strong> gravitation,or that general property which, when it causes bodies to tend toward<strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth, is called weight. Hence to assert that all matteris heavy, is no more than to say, that attraction <strong>of</strong> gravitation exists betweenallor any masses <strong>of</strong> matter.1799. You say, '^it may be urged that we have no difficulty in conceiving<strong>of</strong> matter which is not heavy." I have no hesitation in assertingthat <strong>the</strong>re should be no difficulty in entertaining such a conception ;sinceI cannot understand why any two masses may not be as readily conceivedto repel, as to attract each o<strong>the</strong>r, or nei<strong>the</strong>r to attract nor to repel. Is itnot easier to imagine two remote masses indifferent to each o<strong>the</strong>r, than that24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!