11.07.2015 Views

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

Experimental investigation of the spirit manifestations, [electronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

434 APPENDIX.additions <strong>the</strong> matter shall become loss and less, until it is not two-thirds<strong>of</strong> its original volume. If a given btdk <strong>of</strong> potassium contains 45 atoms,<strong>the</strong> same bulk <strong>of</strong> hydrate <strong>of</strong> potnssa contains 70 atoms nearly <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> metalp<strong>of</strong>assuim, and, besides that, 210 atoms more <strong>of</strong> oxygen and hydrogen. Indealing with assumptions, I must assume a little more for <strong>the</strong> sake <strong>of</strong>making any kind <strong>of</strong> statement ; let me <strong>the</strong>refore assume that in <strong>the</strong> hydrate<strong>of</strong> potassa <strong>the</strong> atoms are all <strong>of</strong> one size and nearly touching eacho<strong>the</strong>r, and that in a cubic inch <strong>of</strong> that substance <strong>the</strong>re are 2800 elementaryatoms <strong>of</strong> potassium, oxygen, and hydrogen; take 2100 atoms <strong>of</strong> oxygenand hydrogen, and <strong>the</strong> 700 atoms <strong>of</strong> potassium remaining will swell intomore than a cubic inch and a half; and if we diminish <strong>the</strong> number untilonly those containable in a cubic inch remain, we shall have 430-, or <strong>the</strong>reabout.So a space which can contain 2800 atoms, and among <strong>the</strong>m 700<strong>of</strong> potassium itself, is found to be entirely filled by 430 atoms <strong>of</strong> potassium,as <strong>the</strong>y exist in <strong>the</strong> ordinary state <strong>of</strong> that metal. Surely, <strong>the</strong>n,under <strong>the</strong> suppositions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atomic <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>the</strong> atoms <strong>of</strong> potassium mustbe very far apart in <strong>the</strong> metal, i. e. <strong>the</strong>re must be much more <strong>of</strong> spacethan <strong>of</strong> matter in that body; yet it is an excellent conductor; and so spacemust be a conductor, but <strong>the</strong>n what becomes <strong>of</strong> shellac, sulphur, and all<strong>the</strong> insulators ? for space must also, by <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory, exist in <strong>the</strong>m.Again, <strong>the</strong> volume which will contain 430 atoms <strong>of</strong> potassium, andnothing else while in <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> metal, will, when that potassium is convertedinto nitre, contain very nearly <strong>the</strong> same number <strong>of</strong> atoms <strong>of</strong> potassium,'/. e. 416, and also <strong>the</strong>n seven times as many, or 2912 atoms, <strong>of</strong> nitrogenand oxygen beside. In carbonate <strong>of</strong> potassa, <strong>the</strong> space which willcontain only <strong>the</strong> 430 atoms <strong>of</strong> potassium as metal, being entirely filledby it, will, after <strong>the</strong> conversion, contain 256 atoms more <strong>of</strong> potassium,making 680 atoms <strong>of</strong> that metal, and in addition 2744 atoms <strong>of</strong> oxj'gcnand carbon.These and similar considerations might be extended through compounds<strong>of</strong> sodium and o<strong>the</strong>r bodies, with results equally striking, and indeed moreso, when <strong>the</strong> relations <strong>of</strong> one substance, as oxygen and sulphur, with differentbodies are brought into comparison.I am not ignorant that <strong>the</strong> mind is most powerfully drawn- by <strong>the</strong> phenomena<strong>of</strong> crystallization, chemistry, and physics generally to <strong>the</strong> acknowledgment<strong>of</strong> centres <strong>of</strong> force. I feel m3^self constrained, for <strong>the</strong> present,hypo<strong>the</strong>tically to admit <strong>the</strong>m, and cannot do without <strong>the</strong>m ;but I feelgreat difiiculty in <strong>the</strong> conception <strong>of</strong> atoms <strong>of</strong> matter which in solids, fluids,and vapours are supposed to be more or less apart from each o<strong>the</strong>r, withintervening space not occupied by atoms, and perceive great contradictionsin <strong>the</strong> conclusions which flow from such a view.If we must assume at all, as indeed in a branch <strong>of</strong> knowledge like <strong>the</strong>present we can hardly help it, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> safest course appears to be to assumeas little as possible ; and in that respect <strong>the</strong> atoms <strong>of</strong> Boscovich appearto me to have a great advantage over <strong>the</strong> more usual notion. Hisatoms, if I understand aright, are mere centres <strong>of</strong> forces or powers, notparticles <strong>of</strong> matter in which <strong>the</strong> powers <strong>the</strong>mselves reside. If in <strong>the</strong>ordinary view <strong>of</strong> atoms, we call <strong>the</strong> particle <strong>of</strong> matter away from <strong>the</strong>powers a, and <strong>the</strong> system <strong>of</strong> powers or forces in and around it m, <strong>the</strong>n in<strong>the</strong>ory a disappears, and is a mere ma<strong>the</strong>matical point, whileBoscovicli'sin <strong>the</strong> usual notion it is a little, unchangeable, impenetrable piece <strong>of</strong> matter,and m is an atmosphere <strong>of</strong> force grouped around it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!