01.12.2012 Views

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Although Kenya’s policy and legal framework provides for a firm foundation for sustainable<br />

management of national biodiversity, there are shortfalls in formal and informal institutional<br />

mediation which leads to cracks during implementation. The result is the continued<br />

degradation of biological diversity in Kenya. Since this study is interested in identifying the<br />

different notions and institutions regarding biodiversity in Kenya, our analysis of the<br />

following acts will rightfully highlight the same. We shall augment this analysis with selected<br />

literature on this subject matter.<br />

The last section of this chapter discusses issues related to biodiversity management including<br />

an evaluation of the demand responsive approaches, the role of international interests in<br />

biodiversity restoration as well as the re-evaluation of formal rule design and mediation.<br />

The Forests Act, chapter 385 of the laws of Kenya<br />

This law was established as an act of parliament to protect the country’s forest biodiversity in<br />

terms of forest flora and fauna. The Forests Act, Captor. 385 of Laws of Kenya was first<br />

enacted in 1962. It was subsequently revised in 1982, 1992 and 2005. The Act defines a forest<br />

as “an area of land declared under section 4 to be a forest area.” The Act addresses<br />

preservation, protection, management, enforcement and utilization of forests and forest<br />

resources on Government land. The Forests Act is also applicable to Forest Reserves. This<br />

Act interprets biodiversity to mean the variability among living organisms from all sources<br />

including ecological complexes of which they are part and the diversity within and among<br />

species and ecosystems. According to this Act the forests and woodlands are construed to be<br />

the natural habitats for biodiversity. The Act, thus defines a forest as: land containing a<br />

vegetation association dominated by trees of any size, whether exploitable or not, capable of<br />

producing wood and other products, potentially capable of influencing climate, exercising and<br />

influence on soil, water regime and providing habitat for wildlife and includes woodlands.<br />

This same Act also defines forestry as the act of tendering, utilizing, establishing and<br />

protecting forest and tree resources and therefore includes the processing and use of forest and<br />

tree products. Lund defined a forest as an ecological system dominated by trees and other<br />

woody vegetation. Forest communities are characterized by complex interactions between<br />

woody and herbaceous flora, fauna, soils and other physical factors. 539 The International<br />

Conservation Union (IUCN) defines forests as tree dominated landscapes. 540<br />

According to the current Forests Act, Forest Reserves are land areas that have been surveyed,<br />

demarcated and gazetted. They can be gazetted either from Trust Land or from unalienated<br />

government land. Forest Reserves on government land are managed by the Forest<br />

Department, while those on Trust Land are managed by local authorities. By 1994, gazetted<br />

forest reserves on government land amounted to 1,359,254 ha, while gazetted forest reserves<br />

on trust lands totalled 328,136 ha. This amounts to about 20% of the total area gazetted as<br />

539<br />

Lund, H. 2006. Definitions of Forest, Deforestation, Afforestation, and Reforestation'. Gainesville, VA:<br />

Forest Information Services.<br />

540<br />

IUCN. 1996. Forest Cover and Forest Reserves in Kenya: Policy and Practice. Nairobi: IUCN.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!