THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG
THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG
THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Although Kenya’s policy and legal framework provides for a firm foundation for sustainable<br />
management of national biodiversity, there are shortfalls in formal and informal institutional<br />
mediation which leads to cracks during implementation. The result is the continued<br />
degradation of biological diversity in Kenya. Since this study is interested in identifying the<br />
different notions and institutions regarding biodiversity in Kenya, our analysis of the<br />
following acts will rightfully highlight the same. We shall augment this analysis with selected<br />
literature on this subject matter.<br />
The last section of this chapter discusses issues related to biodiversity management including<br />
an evaluation of the demand responsive approaches, the role of international interests in<br />
biodiversity restoration as well as the re-evaluation of formal rule design and mediation.<br />
The Forests Act, chapter 385 of the laws of Kenya<br />
This law was established as an act of parliament to protect the country’s forest biodiversity in<br />
terms of forest flora and fauna. The Forests Act, Captor. 385 of Laws of Kenya was first<br />
enacted in 1962. It was subsequently revised in 1982, 1992 and 2005. The Act defines a forest<br />
as “an area of land declared under section 4 to be a forest area.” The Act addresses<br />
preservation, protection, management, enforcement and utilization of forests and forest<br />
resources on Government land. The Forests Act is also applicable to Forest Reserves. This<br />
Act interprets biodiversity to mean the variability among living organisms from all sources<br />
including ecological complexes of which they are part and the diversity within and among<br />
species and ecosystems. According to this Act the forests and woodlands are construed to be<br />
the natural habitats for biodiversity. The Act, thus defines a forest as: land containing a<br />
vegetation association dominated by trees of any size, whether exploitable or not, capable of<br />
producing wood and other products, potentially capable of influencing climate, exercising and<br />
influence on soil, water regime and providing habitat for wildlife and includes woodlands.<br />
This same Act also defines forestry as the act of tendering, utilizing, establishing and<br />
protecting forest and tree resources and therefore includes the processing and use of forest and<br />
tree products. Lund defined a forest as an ecological system dominated by trees and other<br />
woody vegetation. Forest communities are characterized by complex interactions between<br />
woody and herbaceous flora, fauna, soils and other physical factors. 539 The International<br />
Conservation Union (IUCN) defines forests as tree dominated landscapes. 540<br />
According to the current Forests Act, Forest Reserves are land areas that have been surveyed,<br />
demarcated and gazetted. They can be gazetted either from Trust Land or from unalienated<br />
government land. Forest Reserves on government land are managed by the Forest<br />
Department, while those on Trust Land are managed by local authorities. By 1994, gazetted<br />
forest reserves on government land amounted to 1,359,254 ha, while gazetted forest reserves<br />
on trust lands totalled 328,136 ha. This amounts to about 20% of the total area gazetted as<br />
539<br />
Lund, H. 2006. Definitions of Forest, Deforestation, Afforestation, and Reforestation'. Gainesville, VA:<br />
Forest Information Services.<br />
540<br />
IUCN. 1996. Forest Cover and Forest Reserves in Kenya: Policy and Practice. Nairobi: IUCN.<br />
111