01.12.2012 Views

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

deliberately destroyed. 392 Very often, land was sold by grantees without any adherence to the<br />

conditions laid down by letters of allotment, and many illegal titles to public land were<br />

transferred to third parties. In most circumstances such land belonged to state corporations<br />

and the Forest Department. 393<br />

The Ndung’u Report on land which was illegally allocated to individuals and companies, and<br />

then often sold on to third parties, whilst land reserved for public purposes such as forests,<br />

national sanctuaries and reserves etc., had been sold off in blatant disregard of the law by both<br />

the Commissioner of Lands and numerous local Authorities. 394 In summary, it was found out<br />

that the powers vested in the President had been grossly abused by both the President and<br />

successive Commissioners of Lands and their deputies over the years. This happened under<br />

both the Kenyatta and Moi regimes. At the lower levels, there had been unbridled plunder of<br />

public land and other biodiversity resources by local councillors and provincial officials. 395<br />

Most high profile allocations of forested land were made to companies incorporated by<br />

henchmen in the ruling KANU Party. Finally, and strikingly, the Ndung’u Report found out<br />

that ‘most illegal allocations of public land took place before or soon after the multiparty<br />

general elections of 1992, 1997 and 2002, reinforcing the view that public land was allocated<br />

‘as political reward or patronage, which Bayart referred to as the as the “politics of the<br />

belly”. 396<br />

The other issue that we ought to highlight in this treatment is the farming system that has been<br />

obtained in most of the Kenyan Forests - the shamba system. This is a system used by the<br />

people who live in the forest because they want to participate in some quasi agro-forestry<br />

program. 397 Such people are not really forest dwellers. For they are people who are brought<br />

into the forest to assist the foresters establish commercial plantations. However, they have<br />

been used as agents of deforestation and land grabbing. The shamba system became one of<br />

the transit routes to destroy Kenyan forests. But as it obtains today, this is a very politically<br />

charged issue because there are people who were displaced and have not been able to go back<br />

to their land. This scenario has also led to heated debates, tensions and clashes. There are<br />

chances of more emerging clashes and perhaps making the people to reclaim their land could<br />

probably create more tension since land issues are commonly exploited by politicians in an<br />

effort to obtain political mileage over their rivals.<br />

392<br />

Ibid.<br />

393<br />

Njuguna, P and D. Mbithi. 1996. Reconnaice Survey of Forest blocks in East and Western Rift Valley.<br />

Permanent Presidential Commission on soil consevation and Afforestation. Nairobi.<br />

394<br />

Ibid.<br />

395<br />

The Ndungu Report, Opcit.<br />

396<br />

Bayart, J.F. 1993. The State in Africa: The politics of the belly. London: Longman.<br />

397<br />

Jackqueline, M.P. 2000. Pilfering the Public: The Problem of Land Grabing in Contemporaray Kenya. Africa<br />

Today 47(1): 7-26.<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!