01.12.2012 Views

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

estoration of biodiversity in Kenya. The last part of this chapter provides an insight into the<br />

governance aspect of biodiversity in Kenya.<br />

The fourth chapter details our understanding of biodiversity, local decentralisation and neo-<br />

patrimonial politics in Kenya. The chapter begins with a look at the history of neo-patrimonial<br />

politics and how it led to the degeneration of national biodiversity. The second part makes a<br />

detailed presentation on biodiversity and local decentralisation in Kakamega district,<br />

highlighting issues of bioethics and ends with a discussion on the role of cognitive<br />

institutionalism in appreciating biodiversity conservation.<br />

The fifth chapter looks at institutional mapping at the national and the sub-national levels. It<br />

begins by introducing the national resource management and institutional regimes in Kenya,<br />

institutional roles and responsibilities, evolution of current institutions from the preindependence<br />

times up to the immediate years after independence. The second part of this<br />

chapter makes an analysis of the current policies and legal frameworks. This in a large<br />

measure deals with the current policy approaches to biodiversity conservations. The third part<br />

addresses the processes of institutional design and mediation and the general institutional<br />

legislation. Similarly it investigates the role of international interest as well as showing why<br />

the policy framing process later undertook demand driven approaches.<br />

The sixth chapter makes a presention of results from the local mapping household survey<br />

exercise. The first part deals with the study sample, choice of clusters, and an analysis of the<br />

demographic details of the survey in Kakamega. In the second part we make a detailed look at<br />

biodiversity perceptions, human and environmental values, information on biodiversity,<br />

integration of biodiversity into land use systems and livelihood interests, gender and cultural<br />

practices linked to biodiversity conservation.<br />

The seventh chapter looks at historical and sociological perspectives in Kakamega. The<br />

researcher examines the role of the two institutionalisms in explaining specific cultural and<br />

customary law practices in understanding local ecological thinking and other formal<br />

institutions relating to biodiversity in Kakamega. Furthermore, we analyse perceptions<br />

towards biodiversity formal rules, rules governing access to resources in Kakamega, as well<br />

as community user groups and property rights.<br />

The last chapter makes a final evaluation of the study. In doing so, it re-examines and refocuses<br />

on critical issues regarding biodiversity and resource protection in Kakamega and<br />

Kenya at large. In this chapter, an effort is made to re-contextualise the two important themes<br />

that have been central to this study. These are: institutionalism and local participation in<br />

natural resource management in Kakamega, hence making an outlook on the future of<br />

institutions regarding forest biodiversity conservation in Kenya. In doing so, the study makes<br />

an insight into policy areas that will warrant improvement in the future.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!