THE UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG

Abstract
The study examines the institutional dilemmas in the management of tropical resources.
Specifically, this study is interested in forest biodiversity as the resource in question. The
main objective of this study is to establish and ascertain whether there are conflicting notions
of biodiversity in Kenya and if there are, we are interested in finding out how such conflicting
positions are institutionalised. In pursuit of the above objective, the study uses a case study of
Kakamega forest.
The study primarily used institutional mapping methods in generating and collecting data at
the national and regional and local levels. The findings reveal that forest biodiversity in a
tropical country like Kenya is associated with a number of benefits and these are central in the
framing and/or shaping of the institutions at both the national, regional and local levels.
Because these are structurally different, in most cases they represent the cause of institutional
conflict. What is most intriguing however, is that the Kakamega scenario demonstrates that
one of the biggest challenges in the management of tropical resources lies in the absence of
institutional mediation mechanisms at both national/regional and local levels. The analysis
from this study has revealed that this is the central cause of institutional dysfunctioning in
tropical resource management. This also illuminates the dilemmas that bedevil many natural
resource rich countries especially in the tropics.
In that regard, institutional options especially those targeting forest biodiversity management
should be locally adapted and therefore centrally/regionally mediated, because of the role
local forest resources play in the lives of local communities around the forest. In the same
respect institutionalised participation and mediation in the decision-making/taking is a
necessary prerequisite.
II