01.12.2012 Views

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

306<br />

The same day, the follow<strong>in</strong>g comments appeared on an <strong>ME</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternet group: “There is some parallel with the<br />

treatment of <strong>ME</strong> patients <strong>in</strong> the UK: (1) <strong>ME</strong> patients are given a psychiatric label. (2) As a result, they are<br />

regarded as irrational and their op<strong>in</strong>ions are not taken seriously. (3) Effectively they are silenced, s<strong>in</strong>ce no‐<br />

one will afford them credibility. Not their GPs, not their MPs, not their employers, and sometimes not<br />

their friends. (4) By silenc<strong>in</strong>g patients, their opposition is neutered, and psychiatric dom<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong> <strong>ME</strong><br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ues unchallenged. (5) Liaison psychiatrists exult <strong>in</strong> their success, and bank their loot from the MRC<br />

and DWP” (see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Local<strong>ME</strong>/).<br />

As Greg Crowhurst, husband of an extremely severely affected <strong>ME</strong> sufferer, noted <strong>in</strong> his paper “Be a trouble<br />

maker”: “ ‘You can’t go after a health care system (that is) under the control of the <strong>in</strong>surance companies<br />

and pharmaceutical corporations. That system is immune’ warns Noam Chomsky <strong>in</strong> his latest book<br />

(Interventions; Hamish Hamilton, 2007), yet a radical corporate‐led health care system is exactly what New<br />

Labour are br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>in</strong> the UK, shadily and with little public consultation. Large companies are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>vited to tender for the commission<strong>in</strong>g function of Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). Private companies will<br />

then have control over which treatments patients receive and who receives them. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical decision‐mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

will <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly come under the control of commercial managers and shareholders. That great bane of <strong>ME</strong><br />

sufferers’ lives, the medical <strong>in</strong>surance <strong>in</strong>dustry – which s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid 1980s has lobbied hard with great<br />

success to have <strong>ME</strong> reclassified as a psychiatric behavioural disturbance, <strong>in</strong> order to avoid massive pay<br />

outs – makes no secret of its <strong>in</strong>tention to take over the UK health market. In 2001, UnumProvident launched<br />

New Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs, a public‐private partnership which has been hugely <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g policy,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> relation to the DWP’s Pathways to Work programme. Illness, accord<strong>in</strong>g to (Unum’s) distorted<br />

logic, is a dysfunction of the person; the problem of illness is located <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s beliefs and<br />

behaviour. New Labour’s Welfare Reform Act was passed <strong>in</strong> May 2007. ‘Pathways to Work’, based on Unum’s<br />

behaviourist logic, is to be rolled out across the country by 2008. GPs and Primary Care staff will be offered rewards<br />

for gett<strong>in</strong>g people back to work. All of this is tak<strong>in</strong>g place aga<strong>in</strong>st a wider picture of social control and state<br />

repression: as ‘the new rulers of the world’ (Pilger 2003), the corporations, aided and abetted by media and<br />

government, take over and implement health and social policies consistent with their own strategic and<br />

economic <strong>in</strong>terests (Noam Chomsky, Failed States, Pengu<strong>in</strong> 2003). These topics however ‘scarcely enter <strong>in</strong>to public<br />

discussion and the basic facts are little known’. What can be done? It means a day‐to‐day dedication to the task. It<br />

means <strong>in</strong>credible courage and determ<strong>in</strong>ation and above all a complete refusal to compromise on the truth that <strong>ME</strong> is a<br />

physical disease” (Co‐Cure ACT, 14 th August 2007).<br />

For more <strong>in</strong>formation, see “Corporate Collusion?” by Hooper, Marshall and Williams<br />

(http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/Corporate_Collusion_2.htm ).<br />

Interviewed on BBC Radio Ulster on 3 rd May 2006, Jonathan Kerr, Senior Lecturer <strong>in</strong> Inflammation,<br />

Department of Cellular and Molecular Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Hon. Consultant <strong>in</strong> Microbiology, St George’s University<br />

of London, discussed his work on abnormal gene expression <strong>in</strong> <strong>ME</strong>/CFS and went on record stat<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

“(<strong>ME</strong>)CFS is complex and it does <strong>in</strong>volve many different systems…many of these patients are severely<br />

affected, so severely that they are bed bound and housebound for the duration of the illness, which may be<br />

lifelong…those that are not bed bound or housebound will have severe limitations <strong>in</strong> their professional<br />

capacity, their personal lives, their social life. So it is a very severe illness”.<br />

The Medical Research Council’s PACE Trial Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>Invest</strong>igators, however, th<strong>in</strong>k that <strong>ME</strong>/CFS is an<br />

aberrant illness belief and that the behavioural modification strategies used <strong>in</strong> the PACE Trial are<br />

curative.<br />

Patients with <strong>ME</strong>/CFS and their families are <strong>in</strong> despair, because no‐one <strong>in</strong> authority <strong>in</strong> the UK seems to be<br />

listen<strong>in</strong>g: as Mike O’Brien MP, M<strong>in</strong>ister of State for Health, made pla<strong>in</strong> at the APPG<strong>ME</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g on 2 nd<br />

December 2009, M<strong>in</strong>isters can no longer tell agencies of State what to do. This apparently means that, no<br />

matter what conclusions are arrived at or what recommendations are made or what evidence is put before a<br />

M<strong>in</strong>ister, the M<strong>in</strong>ister concerned can deny hav<strong>in</strong>g any power to implement change. The M<strong>in</strong>ister himself is<br />

reported to have said that he could not require the MRC to undertake research <strong>in</strong> any specific field, nor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!