01.12.2012 Views

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

319<br />

def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g feature of <strong>ME</strong>/CFS (the def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g feature of <strong>ME</strong>/CFS be<strong>in</strong>g post‐exertional muscle fatigability<br />

with malaise).<br />

Of concern is the fact that the authors stated: “The aim was to show patients that activity could be<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased steadily and safely without exacerbat<strong>in</strong>g symptoms”. That is a remarkable statement. It<br />

demonstrates that the authors had decided ‐‐ <strong>in</strong> advance of the outcome ‐‐ that activity could be <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

without exacerbat<strong>in</strong>g symptoms. This was not merely the authors’ hypothesis: that this would be the<br />

outcome was taken for granted.<br />

Of note is the fact that the outcome did not meet the authors’ certa<strong>in</strong>ty, and the authors had to concede that:<br />

“cognitive behaviour therapy was not uniformly effective: a proportion of patients rema<strong>in</strong>ed fatigued and<br />

symptomatic”. Perhaps for this reason, the presentation of results was mostly reported as averages, rather<br />

than giv<strong>in</strong>g actual numbers of patients. The authors acknowledged that: “The data from all the outcome<br />

measures were skewed and not normally distributed, with vary<strong>in</strong>g distributions at each measurement po<strong>in</strong>t”. In such<br />

circumstances, merely provid<strong>in</strong>g “average” figures is not the most appropriate illustration of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. In<br />

summary, this RCT has little relevance <strong>in</strong> general and none whatever to people with <strong>ME</strong>/CFS.<br />

Burgess and Chalder’s <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g members of the public who bought their book that the trials they cited<br />

were double bl<strong>in</strong>d when they were not even s<strong>in</strong>gle bl<strong>in</strong>d, and their reliance on studies that were shown to be<br />

flawed, demonstrates a worry<strong>in</strong>g and evident failure to understand the most elementary tenets of the<br />

scientific process.<br />

These same people are, however, the authors of the MRC PACE Trial Manuals on CBT for both<br />

therapists and participants, which sadly are also replete with mis<strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

There are seven Manuals for the PACE Trial; these are:<br />

The Therapists’ Manual for Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is written by Mary Burgess and Trudie<br />

Chalder. It is entitled: “Manual for Therapists. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for CFS/<strong>ME</strong>”.<br />

Acknowledgements are made to Jessica Bav<strong>in</strong>ton, Diane Cox, V<strong>in</strong>cent Deary, Michael Sharpe, Bella<br />

Stensnas, Sue Wilk<strong>in</strong>s, Giselle Withers and Peter White.<br />

The Therapists’ Manual for Graded Exercise Therapy (GET) is written by Jessica Bav<strong>in</strong>ton, Lucy<br />

Darbishire and Peter White and is entitled “Manual for Therapists. Graded Exercise Therapy for CFS/<strong>ME</strong>”.<br />

(Dr Lucy Darbishire – now Dr Lucy Clark – an exercise scientist from K<strong>in</strong>g’s College, London, believes that<br />

CFS is “just another end of the spectrum [of fatigue]” – Brit J Gen Practice 2003:53:441‐445). She is not to be<br />

confused with Professor Janet Darbyshire, Chair of the PACE Trial Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee.<br />

Acknowledgements are made, amongst others, to Mary Burgess, Diane Cox, Trudie Chalder, Kathy Fulcher,<br />

Gabrielle Murphy, Paul<strong>in</strong>e Powell and Michael Sharpe. Contributions from (un‐named) members of the<br />

Trial Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee, the Data Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and Ethics Committee and the Trial Management Group are<br />

also acknowledged.<br />

The Therapists’ Manual for Adaptive Pac<strong>in</strong>g Therapy is entitled “Adaptive Pac<strong>in</strong>g Therapy (APT) for<br />

CFS/<strong>ME</strong>” and is written by Diane Cox, Sally Ludlum, Louise Mason, Sally Wagner and Michael Sharpe.<br />

Acknowledgements for their <strong>in</strong>valuable contribution are made to Mary Burgess, Jessica Bav<strong>in</strong>ton, V<strong>in</strong>cent<br />

Deary, Trudie Chalder and Peter White.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!