01.12.2012 Views

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

364<br />

Moreover, recent research has compell<strong>in</strong>gly demonstrated that “activity‐related symptom worsen<strong>in</strong>g is not<br />

caused by worsened sleep” (Togo F, Natelson BH, Cook DB et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010:42(1):16‐22).<br />

In the PACE Trial, the biomedical evidence is denied and disregarded; there is emphasis on “Motivat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

yourself” and participants are given a list of “ideas that may help you to keep to your programme” (more “positive<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forcement”); these ideas <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• “Keep a written plan at all times<br />

• “Write down details of your exercise or physical activity achievements<br />

• “Keep lists of plans and tick them off once you have done them<br />

• “Keep a diary outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g all the th<strong>in</strong>gs you learn from your GET<br />

• “Tell friends and family about your plans and progress<br />

• “Reward yourself when you have stuck to your plans, e.g. putt<strong>in</strong>g some money aside every time you<br />

undertake your plan (many people with <strong>ME</strong>/CFS are <strong>in</strong> receipt of State benefits and are barely able to<br />

survive f<strong>in</strong>ancially, so this “idea” illustrates how out of touch with reality the authors are)<br />

• “Frequently go over your old plans and exercise sheets and see the progress you have made (more “positive<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forcement”)<br />

• “Become familiar with the GET theory<br />

• “Draw a graph of the progress you are mak<strong>in</strong>g so that you can see your exercise time go<strong>in</strong>g up (yet more<br />

“positive re<strong>in</strong>forcement”)<br />

• “Do your activity or exercise with other people<br />

• “Become <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a club or gym…so that you can become committed to your plans”.<br />

The whole flavour of this section appears <strong>in</strong>fantile yet coercive.<br />

Next comes a section on “Deal<strong>in</strong>g with setbacks” <strong>in</strong> which GET participants are told: “Setbacks are a normal part<br />

of gett<strong>in</strong>g better”. This is an irresponsible assertion by the authors because not only does it imply that<br />

recovery is expected by re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g the message that participants will get better (more “positive<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forcement”) when there is no evidence of recovery from <strong>ME</strong>/CFS, it also untrue because “setbacks” (more<br />

accurately called a relapse) are not a “normal part of gett<strong>in</strong>g better”.<br />

The authors even augment the mis<strong>in</strong>formation by claim<strong>in</strong>g: “Therapy usually follows an ‘up and down’ pattern,<br />

but with an overall upwards trend” (“positive re<strong>in</strong>forcement” aga<strong>in</strong>, which ignores the evidence that at least 25%<br />

of people with <strong>ME</strong>/CFS do not improve with any “therapy”).<br />

GET participants are told (<strong>in</strong> bold text <strong>in</strong> the Manual): “The good news: it is normal for setbacks to become<br />

less severe, more manageable and last for less time as you get better…the overall trend is usually upwards”.<br />

This seems to be <strong>in</strong>tended to encourage compliance and is another unqualified assumption stated as fact;<br />

moreover it might <strong>in</strong>stil despair <strong>in</strong>to those participants who may not be improv<strong>in</strong>g (if, that is, any<br />

participants selected for the PACE Trial fall <strong>in</strong>to such a category, s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>Invest</strong>igators anticipated hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

people on the trial who were walk<strong>in</strong>g for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes each day anyway).<br />

The message about “setbacks” is clear: dur<strong>in</strong>g a relapse, GET participants must “ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> as much physical<br />

activity as you can”. The authors do, however, concede: “if you are not feel<strong>in</strong>g well due to a CFS/<strong>ME</strong> setback,<br />

then the advice is different” but they then negate what they themselves have just advised:<br />

“Dur<strong>in</strong>g a CFS/<strong>ME</strong> setback, it is understandable that you might wish to rest and reduce the amount of activity you do,<br />

because you don’t feel well and activity feels much harder than usual. This may even be a time <strong>in</strong> which you become<br />

concerned that the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> symptoms may be caus<strong>in</strong>g you damage. The evidence we have is <strong>in</strong> fact the opposite:<br />

there is no evidence to suggest that an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> symptoms is caus<strong>in</strong>g you harm. It is certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

uncomfortable and unpleasant, but not harmful” (this is <strong>in</strong> bold text <strong>in</strong> the Manual).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!