MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72<br />
Medical scientists and most cl<strong>in</strong>icians know that symptoms are a signal that someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the body is<br />
wrong, and that symptoms are not merely “bothersome bodily or mental sensations” as claimed by Waddell and<br />
Aylward and as described <strong>in</strong> the Green Paper that preceded the Pathways to Work reforms.<br />
The Wessely School social reformists have re‐<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ed term<strong>in</strong>ology to mean what they want it to mean. They seem <strong>in</strong>tent on dis‐<br />
empower<strong>in</strong>g general practitioners, and the MRC PACE Trial seems to be part of<br />
this constructed “evidence”.<br />
Dr Suzanne Vernon, former <strong>ME</strong>/<br />
CFS researcher at the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) but s<strong>in</strong>ce 2007 Scientific Director of the<br />
CFIDS Association of America, stated on 5 th December 2008 that there are now more than 5,000 peer‐<br />
reviewed articles <strong>in</strong> the biomedical literature that tell us a lot about the disrupted biology of <strong>ME</strong>/<br />
CFS, about what happens to the immune and endocr<strong>in</strong>e systems and to the autonomic and<br />
central nervous systems.<br />
When asked why this <strong>in</strong>formation had not been harnessed, her reply was that there is no good reason why it<br />
has not been translated to the medical community, say<strong>in</strong>g: “no‐one is fill<strong>in</strong>g that gap between the bench research<br />
and the bedside”.<br />
This is an important po<strong>in</strong>t: it is not that accurate <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge are unavailable; it is that<br />
the <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge are be<strong>in</strong>g systematically blocked by the extremely efficient and effective<br />
network<strong>in</strong>g of the Wessely School who ensure that the gap between bench and bed is filled with their<br />
own views about “CFS/<strong>ME</strong>”.<br />
That network<strong>in</strong>g also <strong>in</strong>cludes Wikipedia, which is one of the first ports of call for computer‐<br />
literate people<br />
seek<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on the <strong>in</strong>ternet. Despite the seem<strong>in</strong>gly false premise upon which the Wessely School<br />
model of “CFS/<strong>ME</strong>” is founded, it is their view which currently dom<strong>in</strong>ates; <strong>in</strong>deed, as noted by Alex Young<br />
(Co‐Cure ACT: 7 th September 2009), the Wikipedia entry now has a strong biopsychosocial bias, focus<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
illness behaviour and mood disorders and on the alleged efficacy of CBT/GET. (A more accurate source of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>ME</strong>/CFS than Wikipedia is to be found on Disapedia:<br />
http://www.disapedia.com/<strong>in</strong>dex.php?title=Myalgic_Encephalomyelitis_(<strong>ME</strong>)).<br />
Not only do the Wessely School flood the UK medical journals with their own beliefs about the nature of<br />
“CFS/<strong>ME</strong>”, to the extent that it would take a brave editor to publish a contrary view (editors frequently<br />
publish highly uncritical assessments of CBT which focus on the few studies that support its use, whilst<br />
ignor<strong>in</strong>g those controlled trials which did not f<strong>in</strong>d CBT to be effective and which warned about the dangers<br />
of exercis<strong>in</strong>g beyond physiological exhaustion), but the Wessely School also seem to have open access to<br />
major Australian and US journals and thus to an <strong>in</strong>ternational audience. They also frequently publish <strong>in</strong> the<br />
medical trade journals which have wide circulation, and they seem to control to a large extent what is<br />
published about “CFS/<strong>ME</strong>” <strong>in</strong> the UK media seem<strong>in</strong>gly through Wessely’s <strong>in</strong>volvement with the Science<br />
Media Centre (SMC), where he is on the Scientific Advisory Panel.<br />
The SMC was set up <strong>in</strong> 1999 under New Labour to operate like a newsroom for national and local media<br />
when science stories hit the headl<strong>in</strong>es, thus ensur<strong>in</strong>g that only the Government’s chosen “policy” about a<br />
medical or scientific issue is reported. The SMC provides “tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g days” for journalists as well as<br />
bra<strong>in</strong>storm<strong>in</strong>g sessions on ways to improve the communication of science through the media. It also<br />
provides off‐the‐record brief<strong>in</strong>gs with key figures at the centre of controversial issues who want to<br />
communicate with the media without be<strong>in</strong>g quoted directly. It is used by its Director Fiona Fox to promote<br />
the views of <strong>in</strong>dustry and to launch fierce attacks aga<strong>in</strong>st those who question them. It is sponsored by the<br />
Royal College of Physicians, The Science Council, the drug company Pfizer and Merl<strong>in</strong> Biosciences, amongst<br />
others. The SMC website records Professor Simon Wessely as say<strong>in</strong>g: “We need to defend scientific expertise as<br />
a basis for sound policy decisions”. Its website also states: “Lucy Thorpe and her colleagues at Radio Five Live, and<br />
Professor Simon Wessely urged the SMC staff to f<strong>in</strong>d ‘members of the public’ to speak out for science”<br />
(http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/uploadDir/536adm<strong>in</strong>consultation_report.pdf). It is the case that Health