MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
55<br />
The CISSD project was the bra<strong>in</strong>child of Richard Sykes PhD (director of the former <strong>ME</strong> charity “Westcare”<br />
that has now been subsumed with<strong>in</strong> Action for <strong>ME</strong>) who states that the impetus for it was the suggestion by<br />
many psychiatrists and others that “CFS” should be regarded and classified as a “mental” disorder that falls<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the category of somatoform disorders and the difficulties this caused for patients. The project aimed<br />
to consider the whole spectrum of current somatoform classification; membership comprised over 80<br />
advisors with a core work group of 33 members, the large majority be<strong>in</strong>g psychiatrists.<br />
Sykes notes: “It is true that CFS is listed under ‘syndrome’ <strong>in</strong> Volume III, the Index of ICD‐10, and placed <strong>in</strong> G93.3,<br />
a category of neurological illness. But there rema<strong>in</strong> problems: (1) some psychiatrists and others contest this<br />
classification of CFS as a neurological disorder and (2) ‘fatigue syndrome’ is listed <strong>in</strong> ICD‐10 as F48, a mental disorder<br />
– which creates the apparent anomaly that ‘fatigue syndrome’ is a mental disorder, but ‘chronic fatigue syndrome’ is a<br />
neurological disorder” (http://t<strong>in</strong>yurl.com/yz88mks ).<br />
One respected patients’ advocate commented on Sykes’ summary of his project:<br />
“So basically, Richard Sykes created a “honey pot” for the discussion of CFS <strong>in</strong> relation to Somatoform Disorder and<br />
all the bees came to the honey pot. We only have his word that there is now a greater chance that CFS will be kept as a<br />
neurological classification. The people who came to the honey pot are still far more powerful than Sykes and what’s<br />
more the comb<strong>in</strong>ed force of those who came to the honey pot could just have had the effect of mak<strong>in</strong>g their collective<br />
voice more powerful still.<br />
“ I do not believe that any somatoform psychiatrists have any <strong>in</strong>tention of lett<strong>in</strong>g go of CFS. Physical symptoms –<br />
blame the patient – no underly<strong>in</strong>g disease processes found – ignore the available research and evidence. They<br />
demonstrate time and aga<strong>in</strong> that these “professionals” really only care for their shared beliefs more than they care for<br />
the facts or the truth or the patients. World wars have been fought to overcome powerful <strong>in</strong>dividuals who share this<br />
sort of behaviour” (www.meactionuk.org.uk/commentonsykes.htm).<br />
Many of those who have <strong>in</strong>formed the CISSD Project are highly <strong>in</strong>fluential, <strong>in</strong>ternationally published<br />
researchers and cl<strong>in</strong>icians <strong>in</strong> the field of psychiatry and psychosomatics and <strong>in</strong>clude Kurt Kroenke, Richard<br />
Mayou, Per F<strong>in</strong>k, Peter Henn<strong>in</strong>gsen, Veronque de Gucht, Bernd Löwe, Wolfgang Hiller and W<strong>in</strong>fried Rief.<br />
At least five members of Sykes’ Project have gone on to become members of the American Psychiatric<br />
Association Work Groups, with four hav<strong>in</strong>g been appo<strong>in</strong>ted to the DSM‐V Somatic Symptoms Disorders<br />
Work Group (Professors Michael Sharpe, Francis Creed, Arthur Barsky and James Levenson), with Javier<br />
Escobar be<strong>in</strong>g appo<strong>in</strong>ted a member of the DSM‐V Task Force.<br />
Throughout their professional lifetime many of these psychiatrists have held entrenched views and have<br />
built their careers upon them; it is unrealistic to suppose that they will rel<strong>in</strong>quish those views <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terests<br />
of mere medical science.<br />
Barksy, for <strong>in</strong>stance, is well‐known for his belief that <strong>ME</strong>/CFS patients’ suffer<strong>in</strong>g “is exacerbated by a self‐<br />
perpetuat<strong>in</strong>g, self‐validat<strong>in</strong>g cycle <strong>in</strong> which common somatic symptoms are <strong>in</strong>correctly attributed to serious<br />
abnormality, re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g the patient’s belief that he or she has a serious disease. Four psychosocial factors propel this<br />
cycle of symptom amplification: the belief that one has a serious disease; the expectation that one’s condition is likely to<br />
worsen; the ‘sick role’ <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the effects of litigation and compensation; and the alarm<strong>in</strong>g portrayal of the condition<br />
as catastrophic and disabl<strong>in</strong>g”. He then added another exacerbat<strong>in</strong>g factor: “a cl<strong>in</strong>ical approach that over‐<br />
emphasises the biomedical and ignores the psychosocial factors”. He cont<strong>in</strong>ued: “symptom amplification operates <strong>in</strong><br />
each <strong>in</strong>dividual sufferer. It may also serve as a mechanism for ‘transmitt<strong>in</strong>g’ the syndrome from one person to<br />
another”. Barsky ended his article by call<strong>in</strong>g upon the media, say<strong>in</strong>g they must offer “a less sensational, more<br />
accurate and more sophisticated model” of functional somatic syndromes, <strong>in</strong> which he <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>ME</strong>/CFS,<br />
fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome (Ann Intern Med 1999:130:11:910‐921).<br />
Letters sent to the journal commentat<strong>in</strong>g on the Barsky paper <strong>in</strong>cluded the follow<strong>in</strong>g: