MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
44<br />
The MRC’s secret files on <strong>ME</strong>/CFS<br />
It is unknown whether or not the refusal of the MRC to <strong>in</strong>vestigate David Sampson’s legitimate compla<strong>in</strong>t<br />
has anyth<strong>in</strong>g to do with the fact that the MRC has a secret file on <strong>ME</strong> that conta<strong>in</strong>s records and<br />
correspondence s<strong>in</strong>ce at least 1988 which, co‐<strong>in</strong>cidentally, is about the time that Simon Wessely began to<br />
deny the existence of <strong>ME</strong>. The file is held <strong>in</strong> the UK Government National Archives at Kew (formerly known<br />
as the Public Record Office) and was understood to be closed until 2023, but this closed period has been<br />
extended until 2071, at the end of which most people currently suffer<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>ME</strong> will be conveniently dead<br />
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATLN=7&CATID=‐5475665<br />
As one puzzled <strong>ME</strong> sufferer recently noted: “why on earth have a 73 year embargo on these documents on an<br />
illness where a load of neurotic people, mostly women, wrongly th<strong>in</strong>k they are physically ill?”<br />
(http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/<strong>ME</strong>ActionUK/ 14 th October 2009).<br />
The MRC’s secret files on <strong>ME</strong>/<br />
CFS are closed (ie. unavailable to the public) for an unusually lengthy period<br />
of 83 years. The standard closure period is 30 years but, as <strong>in</strong> the case of these files on <strong>ME</strong>/CFS, the standard<br />
closure period may be extended.<br />
The 30‐<br />
year rule usually applies to documents that are exempt from release under a Freedom of Information<br />
Act (FOIA) request and <strong>in</strong>clude, for example, documents concern<strong>in</strong>g the formulation of government policy,<br />
documents related to defence, to national security, to the economy, and documents that are considered very<br />
confidential.<br />
It may be recalled that dur<strong>in</strong>g the life of the Chief Medical Officer’s Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on <strong>ME</strong>/CFS (1998‐<br />
2002), lay members were ordered not to discuss the deliberations and were even threatened with<br />
the Official<br />
Secrets Act, for which no explanation was proffered. A letter dated 16 th June 2000 from Mrs Helen Wigg<strong>in</strong>s<br />
at the Department of Health NHS Executive Headquarters <strong>in</strong> Leeds was sent to lay members of the Work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Group; this letter stressed that it had become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important that any documents or <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong><br />
whole or <strong>in</strong> part, that might contribute to the report must be kept confidential and to this end, members of<br />
the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group might be compelled to sign the Official Secrets Act. This was followed up by a letter<br />
dated 23 rd October 2000 from Lord Hunt of K<strong>in</strong>gs Heath, then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the<br />
Department of Health (ref: POH (6) 5380/83), confirm<strong>in</strong>g that the <strong>in</strong>formation held by the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group<br />
might <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances <strong>in</strong>deed be covered by the Official Secrets Act.<br />
If the psychiatric lobby which dom<strong>in</strong>ated that Work<strong>in</strong>g Group was so confident that they were correct about<br />
<strong>ME</strong>/CFS, why the need to force the suppression of oppos<strong>in</strong>g views by resort<strong>in</strong>g to threats of prosecution<br />
under the Official Secrets Act <strong>in</strong> a Work<strong>in</strong>g Group that had noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with State security but was<br />
supposed to be act<strong>in</strong>g simply <strong>in</strong> the best <strong>in</strong>terests of sick people? This was <strong>in</strong> marked contrast to the “Key<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples” set out <strong>in</strong> the first Brief<strong>in</strong>g Note of March 1999, which stated: “The Group must have<br />
maximum ‘transparency’ ie. as much <strong>in</strong>formation about its activities to be distributed as possible to all potential<br />
<strong>in</strong>terested parties”.<br />
One can but wonder how the consideration of <strong>ME</strong>/<br />
CFS could rank as a state secret and of what, precisely,<br />
was the Department of Health so afraid that it even considered the use of such draconian powers? For the<br />
record, Mrs Wigg<strong>in</strong>s was replaced by Robert Hark<strong>in</strong>s and it was he who sent the letter dated 25 th May 2004<br />
(ref: <strong>TO</strong>1056746) <strong>in</strong> which he stated that the then new centres for CFS “will be headed up exclusively by<br />
psychiatrists”, which was deemed to be more evidence of Government “policy” on “CFS/<strong>ME</strong>”.<br />
People wish<strong>in</strong>g to access documents archived at Kew are able to make an application to access documents<br />
that are not redacted or closed, but the procedure is lengthy. Prior notification and advance book<strong>in</strong>g are<br />
required; people must remove their coats / jackets and leave them, together with personal possessions<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g handbags, <strong>in</strong> a locker with a see‐through door for which a numbered key is provided; proof of<br />
identity is mandatory and every person is newly photographed on arrival.