01.12.2012 Views

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

MAGICAL MEDICINE: HOW TO MAKE AN ILLNESS ... - Invest in ME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

34<br />

“These patients want a medical diagnosis for a number of reasons. First, it allows them to negotiate<br />

reduced demands and <strong>in</strong>creased care from family, friends and employer (Sharpe does not consider the plight<br />

of people with <strong>ME</strong>/CFS who have no family and who have lost their friends because of the destructive<br />

impact of the disorder). Second, it may open the way for practical help <strong>in</strong> terms of f<strong>in</strong>ancial and other<br />

benefits from government, employers and <strong>in</strong>surers” (Gen Hosp Psychiat 1998:20:335‐338).<br />

“My own view has long been that the issues around CFS/<strong>ME</strong> are the same as those surround<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

acceptance and management of (patients) who suffer conditions that are not dignified by the presence of<br />

what we call disease” (Ann Intern Med 2001:134:9:2:926‐930).<br />

“Factors such as immunological abnormalities are not of cl<strong>in</strong>ical value” (BMJ 2002:325:480‐483).<br />

World experts <strong>in</strong> <strong>ME</strong>/CFS have proved Sharpe to be comprehensively wrong – see below.<br />

Professor Trudie Chalder has fixed ideas about “CFS/<strong>ME</strong>” that seem not to be <strong>in</strong>formed by the biomedical<br />

evidence: “So what is fatigue…it is a subjective symptom… best viewed on a cont<strong>in</strong>uum. Chronic Fatigue<br />

Syndrome… is characterised by profound, <strong>in</strong>capacitat<strong>in</strong>g chronic fatigue, which is unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed by physical or mental<br />

illness…There is considerable controversy about the nature of the syndrome, i.e. whether it is best understood and<br />

managed with<strong>in</strong> a medical or psychiatric framework…There is often a mismatch between patients’ experience and<br />

health professionals’ perspective…CFS patients have more unhelpful beliefs about experienc<strong>in</strong>g and express<strong>in</strong>g<br />

negative emotions than controls…In summary it appears that patients with CFS have some difficulty<br />

regulat<strong>in</strong>g their emotions” (The Importance of Psycho‐social Aspects <strong>in</strong> Develop<strong>in</strong>g Chronic Fatigue<br />

Syndrome:<br />

http://www.rikshospitalet.no/iKnowBase/Content/434520/Chalder‐Psychosocial‐aspects‐of CFS.pdf).<br />

Professor Chalder seems to believe that CBT is a cure‐all. For example, she believes that CBT has a role to<br />

play <strong>in</strong> the control of diabetes: CBT “is show<strong>in</strong>g promise <strong>in</strong> more unlikely fields. Several studies have shown that it<br />

can improve the prognosis for some cancers and this week, Professor Trudie Chalder, of K<strong>in</strong>g’s College, London,<br />

announced that it can help people with type I diabetes. Though her study has not yet been peer‐reviewed or published,<br />

Professor Chalder described the results as positive” (The Times, 15 th September 2007).<br />

Fourteen months later, the study was published <strong>in</strong> the Annals of Internal Medic<strong>in</strong>e (Ann Int Med<br />

2008:149:708‐719). However, the “Summaries for Patients” <strong>in</strong> the same journal says: “The researchers assigned<br />

patients to receive either Motivational Enhancement Therapy (<strong>ME</strong>T), Motivational Enhancement Therapy plus<br />

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT), or usual care. No patient received only CBT, so this study was unable to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the effect of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy alone”.<br />

Professor Chalder’s beliefs about “CFS/<strong>ME</strong>” are unambiguous: <strong>in</strong> 2007 the newly convened Biomedical<br />

Research Unit at the Institute of Psychiatry funded a project called “Emotional Process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Psychosomatic<br />

Disorders”. The Section of General Hospital Psychiatry at the IoP advertised for a psychology graduate to<br />

work on the project, which would “<strong>in</strong>volve work<strong>in</strong>g across the Section on Eat<strong>in</strong>g Disorders and the Chronic<br />

Fatigue Research and Treatment Unit”. The clos<strong>in</strong>g date for applications was 13 th July 2007. The job reference<br />

was 07/R68. The advertisement said: “The post holder will work under the immediate supervision of<br />

Professors Ulrike Schmidt (<strong>AN</strong>) and Trudie Chalder (CFS)”.<br />

The study literature stated: “The comparison with CFS will allow (researchers) to gauge whether any social<br />

cognition deficits are unique to anorexia, or reflect more global symptoms of psychiatric illness with marked physical<br />

symptoms”. So there it is <strong>in</strong> black and white: accord<strong>in</strong>g to one of the MRC PACE Trial Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>Invest</strong>igators,<br />

“CFS” is “a psychiatric illness with marked physical symptoms”. Applicants were <strong>in</strong>formed that: “Aberrant<br />

emotional process<strong>in</strong>g is a strong candidate as a ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g factor for these disorders” and the background<br />

to the project stated: “Anorexia Nervosa (<strong>AN</strong>) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are classical<br />

psychosomatic disorders where response to social threat is expressed somatically”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!