DRAFT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PEER REVIEWA peer review analysis is generally conducted to compare a transit system’s performance at a given point intime with other transit systems having similar operating characteristics. A peer review was conducted usingvalidated 2008 NTD reports for PSTA and all potential peers. Selected performance indicators,effectiveness measures, and efficiency measures are provided throughout this section in tabular format toillustrate the performance of PSTA‘s fixed-route system relative to the peer group. For each selectedindicator and measure, the tables provide the PSTA value, the minimum value among the peer group, themaximum value among the peer group, the mean of the peer group, and the percent that the PSTA’svalues are away from the mean.The peer group selection was based foremost on geographic location within the southeastern U.S.; thestates included were Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia,North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. All the transit systems in these states were analyzedbased on seven indicators including four operating characteristics (passenger trips, revenue miles, vehiclesoperated in maximum service, and total operating expense) and three exogenous variables (service areasize, service area population, and service area population density).In order to select the systems most comparable with PSTA, each indicator’s value for PSTA was used as abase number. Based on this, 80 percent, 90 percent, 110 percent, and 120 percent of PSTA indicatorvalues were calculated, respectively. Potential peers were assigned a score for each of the indicatorsbased on the following criteria:Peers falling between 90 percent of the PSTA value and 110 percent of the PSTA value wereawarded 1.5 points;Peers falling between 80 percent and 90 percent of the PSTA value or between 110 percent and120 percent of the PSTA value were awarded 0.5 points;Peers falling below 80 percent or above 120 percent of the PSTA value were awarded 0.0 points.The total score for each of the indicators by corresponding peers were then summed based on the abovecriteria. The potential peers were then ranked in descending order and the top seven transit systems wereselected as final peers. The top seven peers obtained a total score of at least 2.0. Table 4-20 displays thefinal results of the peer selection process. In all, three Florida peers appear in the peer group, includingJacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA) (8 points), Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority (HART)(8 points), and Palm Beach County (PalmTran) (2 points). The remaining four peers are non-Florida transitsystems.Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.Pinellas Suncoast Transit AuthoritySeptember 2010 4-30 Transit Development Plan
Transit SystemJacksonvilleTransportationAuthority (JTA)Hillsborough AreaRegional TransitAuthority (HART)Greater RichmondTransit Company(GRTC)Transit Authorityof River City(RCTA)Memphis AreaTransit Authority(MATA)Board of CountyCommissioners,Palm BeachCounty, PalmTran,Inc. (PalmTran)Birmingham-Jefferson CountyTransit Authority(BJCTA)PassengerTripsRevenueMilesTable 4-19Peer Selection ResultsServiceAreaSize(squaremiles)ServiceAreaPopulationServiceAreaPopulationDensityVehiclesOperatedinMaximumServiceTotalOperatingExpenseTotalScore0.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0 8.01.5 0 1.5 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.5 8.01.5 0 1.5 0 0 0.5 0 3.50 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 3.00.5 0 0 1.5 0.5 0 0 2.50 0 0 0.5 0 0 1.5 2.00 0 0.5 0 1.5 0 0 2.0Three categories of indicators that were previously used to carry out the performance evaluation and trendanalysis were analyzed in the peer review process.Performance IndicatorsPerformance indicators include passenger trips, revenue miles, revenue hours, and operating expenses.Table 4-21 and Figures 4-5 through 4-8 show the peer review results for those performance indicators.MeasureTable 4-20Peer Review Analysis (Performance Indicators)PSTAPeer GroupMinimumPeer GroupMaximumPeer GroupMeanPSTA % FromMeanPassenger Trips (000) 12,522 3,084 15,081 10,958 14.28%Revenue Miles (000) 9,283 2,792 9,547 6,829 35.94%Revenue Hours (000) 647 224 647 496 30.44%Operating Expense (000) 50,354 19,386 66,047 45,347 11.04%Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.Pinellas Suncoast Transit AuthoritySeptember 2010 4-31 Transit Development Plan
Page 2 and 3:
PINELLASSUNCOASTTRANSITAUTHORITYTra
Page 6 and 7:
Map 3-9 Dwelling Unit Density by TA
Page 8 and 9:
SECTION 1INTRODUCTIONThe Ten-Year T
Page 10 and 11:
ORGANIZATION OF REPORTIn addition t
Page 12 and 13:
Improve the project delivery proces
Page 14 and 15:
Goal: Enrich quality of life and re
Page 16 and 17:
High-Speed Rail (HSR)In April 2009,
Page 18 and 19:
ooooPolicy 1.4.8: The MPO shall con
Page 20 and 21:
According to the Transportation Ele
Page 23 and 24:
were appointed to the PAC by the PS
Page 25:
SECTION 3STUDY AREA CONDITIONS AND
Page 29 and 30:
ANCLOTE RDUS 19ABELCHER RDPASS A GR
Page 31 and 32:
Auto OwnershipBased on the 2000 Cen
Page 33 and 34: Table 3-4Major Private and Public E
Page 35 and 36: ANCLOTE RDUS 19ABELCHER RDPASS A GR
Page 37 and 38: Transportation Disadvantaged Popula
Page 39 and 40: ANCLOTE RDUS 19ABELCHER RDPASS A GR
Page 41 and 42: EAST LAKE DRBELCHER RDUS 19ACR 39SR
Page 43 and 44: Major Trip GeneratorsThe major trip
Page 45 and 46: Developments of Regional ImpactDeve
Page 47 and 48: DRI # Project Name Local Govt.15715
Page 49 and 50: COMMUTING PATTERNSThe 2000 Census p
Page 51 and 52: Figure 3-6 Figure 3-7% Roadways Abo
Page 53 and 54: PopulationPinellas County populatio
Page 55 and 56: SECTION 4EXISTING PSTA SERVICE LEVE
Page 57 and 58: BELCHER RDUS 19ACR 39SR 58062ND ST
Page 59 and 60: PSTA FacilitiesIn 2005, PSTA moved
Page 61 and 62: Table 4-3PSTA Bus Fleet InventoryMa
Page 63 and 64: Table 4-4 (continued)Inventory of T
Page 65 and 66: OPERATING STATISTICSThe current ope
Page 67 and 68: Tables 4-8 and 4-9 include the PSTA
Page 69 and 70: Table 4-8 (Cont’d)Ridership Analy
Page 71 and 72: Table 4-9 (Cont’d)Ridership Analy
Page 73 and 74: Table 4-10 (Cont’d)Service Profil
Page 75 and 76: Demand-Response Transportation Oper
Page 77 and 78: Table 4-13PSTA Cost per Passenger T
Page 79 and 80: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND TRENDSA
Page 81 and 82: The following is a summary of the t
Page 83: Cost Efficiency - This is indicated
Page 87 and 88: Table 4-21Peer Review Analysis (Eff
Page 89 and 90: Figure 4-15 Figure 4-16Operating Ex
Page 91 and 92: SECTION 5MARKET RESEARCH AND PUBLIC
Page 93 and 94: 10. Travel Training/Travel Aids Pro
Page 95 and 96: improvements, and PSTA Board meetin
Page 97 and 98: on-board survey research in conjunc
Page 99 and 100: Pasco CountyEAST LAKE RDGulfofMexic
Page 101 and 102: Figure 5-1Reason for Using Medicaid
Page 103 and 104: Figure 5-3How would you travel if y
Page 105 and 106: Figure 5-6PSTA Service Satisfaction
Page 107 and 108: Questions 9 through 13 asked respon
Page 109 and 110: COMMITTEES AND WORKSHOPSA number of
Page 111 and 112: think about the issue at hand. Peop
Page 113 and 114: Figure 5-10Sample Index Card Illust
Page 115 and 116: Analysis of TAC PrioritiesPriority
Page 117 and 118: PSTA works closely with the TAC on
Page 119 and 120: SECTION 6SITUATION APPRAISAL AND NE
Page 121 and 122: Regional Maintenance Training Facil
Page 123 and 124: Other areas considered as viable lo
Page 125 and 126: Transit Security GrantsPSTA has bee
Page 127 and 128: Regional Transportation IssuesOn Ma
Page 129 and 130: Land UseAlthough much of the curren
Page 131 and 132: Implications - PSTA should prioriti
Page 133 and 134: Transit Network - The transit route
Page 135 and 136:
increase 5.33 percent (from 44,413
Page 137 and 138:
EAST LAKE DRBELCHER RDUS 19ACR 39SR
Page 139 and 140:
Table 7-1Revenue-Constrained Plan -
Page 141 and 142:
Figure 7-1Revenue-Constrained Plan
Page 143 and 144:
Table 7-3Vision Plan - Operating Bu
Page 145 and 146:
Table 7-4Vision Plan - Capital Budg
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 7-6Vision Plan - Combined Op
Page 149 and 150:
C.R. 77 (ROWAN)N.SUNCOASTTROUBLE CR
Page 151 and 152:
C.R. 77 (ROWAN)N.SUNCOASTTROUBLE CR
Page 153 and 154:
Fixed-Guideway Transit (Rail)As ind
Page 155 and 156:
million. Sales tax revenues are to
Page 157 and 158:
Table 7-625-Year Vision Plan - Capi
Page 159 and 160:
Millions$2,500$2,000Figure 7-925-Ye
Page 161 and 162:
PSTA REVENUE FLEET INVENTORYPSTA BU
Page 163 and 164:
PSTA SUPERVISOR AND SERVICE VEHICLE
Page 165 and 166:
12 YEAR SUPPORT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
Page 167 and 168:
SECTION 5307 FORMULA FUNDSFY 2010 P
Page 169 and 170:
ADOPTED FY 2009 AMERICAN RECOVERY A
Page 171 and 172:
THREE-YEAR OPERATING BUDGET PROJECT
Page 173 and 174:
APPENDIX EFAREBOX RECOVERY REPORTTi
Page 175 and 176:
EFFECTIVE FARE CHANGESThe following
Page 177 and 178:
ApprovedFareModificationstobeeffect
Page 179 and 180:
Route58Route59Route74Route75Route79
Page 181 and 182:
HISTORY OF PSTASPECIAL LEGISLATIVE
Page 183 and 184:
APPENDIX HVision Plan Selected Capi
Page 185 and 186:
Table H-4Light Rail Station Costs*L
Page 187 and 188:
Third Penny for Pinellas, Local Inf
show all

DRAFT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?