25.11.2015 Views

LESSONS ENCOUNTERED

lessons-encountered

lessons-encountered

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hoffman and Crowther<br />

tions forces with general purpose units, and materiel changes such as enhanced<br />

body armor and Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles. 22 There were also<br />

doctrinal adaptations including the rapid development of appropriate COIN<br />

doctrine. But this project and chapter are focused at the higher level of strategy.<br />

This chapter’s definition for adaptation is based on that of Theo Farrell, a<br />

leading scholar on military change. He defines adaptation as “change to strategy,<br />

force generation, and/or military plans and operation that is undertaken in<br />

response to operational challenges and campaign pressures.” 23 The two Surge<br />

decision cycles examined herein certainly meet this definition for changes to<br />

strategy, the Services that generated forces, and military plans.<br />

Analytical Framework<br />

For an analytical framework, we modified Risa Brooks’s four attributes of strategic<br />

assessment and adapted them to this study. 24 To extend her attributes to<br />

incorporate the strategic changes generated by the assessment, we added a fifth<br />

element. The five factors are defined as follows:<br />

n Performance assessment mechanisms capture the quality of<br />

institutional structures and processes devoted to evaluations of<br />

our intelligence of enemy capabilities and capacities, as well the<br />

evaluation of our own political and military activities and progress.<br />

Due to the political-military character of irregular conflicts,<br />

such mechanisms must also include a capacity to assess the interdependent<br />

political, diplomatic, and developmental activities<br />

consistent with effective counterinsurgency.<br />

n Collaborative information-sharing environment describes the<br />

routines and conventions of dialogue associated with exchanging<br />

information at the apex of decisionmaking. Key to information-sharing<br />

is the degree of openness and how forthcoming participants<br />

are about options and assessments not favorable to their<br />

preferred policy outcomes. Collaborative does not mean that all<br />

participants were comfortable. But the process should allow perspectives<br />

to be shared in a climate where parties are free to explore<br />

options, test assumptions, and debate merits of options.<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!