25.11.2015 Views

LESSONS ENCOUNTERED

lessons-encountered

lessons-encountered

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lamb with Franco<br />

themes for Operation Enduring Freedom even though they originated in DOD.<br />

However, after a few weeks, State had second thoughts about the themes and<br />

fought to revise them. 196 By the time the United States was preparing for Operation<br />

Iraqi Freedom, interagency differences of opinion on communication<br />

themes were so sharp that none could be agreed upon. The United States went<br />

to war with each department putting out its own storyline. Similarly, as time<br />

passed State insisted that bilateral discussions with foreign governments revert<br />

to well-established practices managed by State.<br />

Interagency relationships in the field were also slow to develop, fragile,<br />

and subject to great variance. We noted that the chemistry between our teams<br />

of Ambassadors and joint force commanders was in some cases productively<br />

catalytic but more frequently corrosive and sometimes explosive. 197 The point<br />

to make here is that interagency success and failure were not just a function<br />

of personal relationships; even Ambassadors and joint force commanders intent<br />

on working well together found it a challenge because their departments<br />

assessed the situation differently and had different priorities and different cultures.<br />

General Casey underscores this point. He notes Presidential guidance<br />

emphasized that helping Iraq through the transition to democracy would take<br />

“the full commitment of all agencies,” and that “in all activities, the Chief of<br />

Mission and Commander, USCENTCOM shall ensure the closest cooperation<br />

and mutual support.” 198 Nevertheless, Casey asserts the guidance:<br />

did not create the unity of command necessary for the effective integration<br />

of civil-military efforts in successful counterinsurgency operations.<br />

The Ambassador and I would have to create the unity of effort required<br />

for success. This would prove a constant struggle as the two supporting<br />

bureaucracies—State and Defense—often had differing views. Things<br />

would get more complex as we increasingly brought the new Iraqi government<br />

into the effort. The political and economic effects, so necessary to<br />

sustaining our military success, would be outside of my direct control. 199<br />

The “often differing views” of State and Defense ensured the large array<br />

of small interagency groups assembled in Afghanistan and Iraq struggled to<br />

be productive. Interagency high-value target teams were hit and miss but improved<br />

over time. The same is true of Provincial Reconstruction Teams, al-<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!